- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Budget deal to get quick vote in the House
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro ‘marriage’
- Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
Akaka bill seeks ethnic-Hawaiian government
A Senate Democrat is pushing a bill that would allow a separate government for ethnic Hawaiians.
Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle and other Republicans also support the bill, which critics say would have dire ramifications beyond Hawaii.
“By creating a race-based government in the United States, we would be enhancing a trend toward the Balkanization of our culture,” said Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, the Senate Republican Policy Committee chairman. “This would be the first time that we would actually be creating a race-based government entity within the United States.”
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Daniel K. Akaka, Hawaii Democrat, would designate ethnic Hawaiians — thought to account for about 20 percent of the state’s population — as an “indigenous people” comparable to American Indians and Alaska natives.
“All my bill does is clarify the political and legal relationship between native Hawaiians and the United States, thereby establishing parity in the federal policies towards American Indians, Alaska natives and native Hawaiians,” Mr. Akaka told The Washington Times last week.
In March, Mrs. Lingle said the bill would help preserve ethnic-Hawaiian culture. She denied critics’ claims that “federal recognition of native Hawaiians constitutes a race-based preference or racial discrimination.”
She told the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs that the bill would help “individual native Hawaiians to become more self-sufficient, which reduces their reliance on state and federally funded services.” She said that a “Native Hawaiian government” could take control of state and federal programs for social services that spend money collected from taxpayers nationwide.
Mr. Akaka said the bill does not automatically “transfer … any lands, assets or natural resources,” but provides for a process for the proposed ethnic-Hawaiian “governing entity” to negotiate such matters with the state and federal governments.
Although details would have to be negotiated, a separate government likely would grant ethnic Hawaiians the same kind of dual U.S.-tribal citizenship as American Indians. Like Indian tribal members, they could be prosecuted for crimes by federal and native authorities and would travel under U.S. passports.
The transfer of any lands to the ethnic-Hawaiian government would be negotiated and, proponents say, probably require further federal and state legislation.
Opponents claim that the process would lead to the ethnic-Hawaiian “entity” having a government-to-government relationship with the United States and autonomy over the affairs of native Hawaiians, with the rest of the state’s population represented by Hawaii’s state government.
“This bill is un-American in that it seeks to define citizenship based on race, rather than shared ideals,” said Bruce Fein, a constitutional lawyer and Justice Department official in the Reagan administration.
Critics say the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2005 would deny state and county governments the full exercise of civil and criminal procedures and jurisdiction over homeland security, render the “tribal” government immune from lawsuits for breach of contract and personal injury, and empower the entity to make unlimited campaign contributions of untaxed dollars as a way to buy political influence.
Sen. Craig Thomas, Wyoming Republican, said his major concerns are the “high, ongoing costs” for federal programs aiding native Hawaiians under the bill as well as the process it sets out for a separate governing entity.
Sen. James M. Inhofe, Oklahoma Republican, has opposed similar legislation, citing concerns from some of his state’s tribes.
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Leon Panetta named as source of 'Zero Dark Thirty' scriptwriters information
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whiskey: U.K.-born expert
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
An objective, analysis-based perspective of D.C. sports as seen through the eyes of lifelong D.C. sports enthusiast, John Heibel.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow