- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
- Foreign minister vows response if Russians are attacked in Ukraine
- Robert Griffin III to drive pace car before Richmond NASCAR race
- Material on Australian shore examined in jet hunt
State ‘receptive’ to idea of paper trail for voting machines
ANNAPOLIS -- A recommendation from a national bipartisan commission is putting new pressure on Maryland officials to revise the state's electronic voting machines system to provide a paper trail.
The commission led by former President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, a Republican, issued a report Monday with 87 recommendations. These include the recommendation that states should use machines that leave a paper trail as a way of increasing voter confidence in the election system.
Henry Fawell, a spokesman for Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., said after the report was issued that the governor "is receptive to the idea of a paper trail."
"He will be appointing a commission to review Maryland election laws in the near future, and they will be giving careful consideration to this issue," Mr. Fawell said.
The Maryland State Board of Elections has contracted with two state universities to study the reliability of the state's Diebold electronic voting machines.
Elections Administrator Linda Lamone said yesterday that the University of Maryland in Baltimore County and the University of Maryland at College Park will "do a study of the voting system and whether or not any additional verification is called for and, if so, what kind."
Mrs. Lamone said the Diebold machines are reliable, provided an accurate count of statewide votes in the primary and general elections last year, and do not need a printed record of each vote.
But she said the two university studies, scheduled to be completed by late December, will be "a very useful road map to help the policy-makers decide the voting system verification issue."
Critics of the machines seized on the Carter-Baker report to press for changes in Maryland.
"It is now nearly impossible to refuse Maryland voters the paper ballot they have been calling for," said Linda Schade, director of TrueVoteMD.org. "Maryland needs to join the rest of the country and recognize that the only way to have transparent, independent vote counts is to provide a paper record that is verified by the voter."
Miss Schade said that with close races possible in the gubernatorial and U.S. Senate elections next year, "voters need to be sure their votes are counted accurately, and that cannot be done on the current Diebold machines."
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- Georgia governor signs bill expanding gun rights
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Harry Reid using tax dollars to fight Koch brothers, La. GOP chair charges
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
- Professor apologizes after blasting Republicans in class
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014