- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Government OKs Arab-owned company to operate U.S. cargo port
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell’s wife had ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
- Hillary: ‘Dead broke’ comment was ‘inartful,’ but insists it was ‘accurate’
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
State ‘receptive’ to idea of paper trail for voting machines
Question of the Day
ANNAPOLIS -- A recommendation from a national bipartisan commission is putting new pressure on Maryland officials to revise the state's electronic voting machines system to provide a paper trail.
The commission led by former President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, a Republican, issued a report Monday with 87 recommendations. These include the recommendation that states should use machines that leave a paper trail as a way of increasing voter confidence in the election system.
Henry Fawell, a spokesman for Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., said after the report was issued that the governor "is receptive to the idea of a paper trail."
"He will be appointing a commission to review Maryland election laws in the near future, and they will be giving careful consideration to this issue," Mr. Fawell said.
The Maryland State Board of Elections has contracted with two state universities to study the reliability of the state's Diebold electronic voting machines.
Elections Administrator Linda Lamone said yesterday that the University of Maryland in Baltimore County and the University of Maryland at College Park will "do a study of the voting system and whether or not any additional verification is called for and, if so, what kind."
Mrs. Lamone said the Diebold machines are reliable, provided an accurate count of statewide votes in the primary and general elections last year, and do not need a printed record of each vote.
But she said the two university studies, scheduled to be completed by late December, will be "a very useful road map to help the policy-makers decide the voting system verification issue."
Critics of the machines seized on the Carter-Baker report to press for changes in Maryland.
"It is now nearly impossible to refuse Maryland voters the paper ballot they have been calling for," said Linda Schade, director of TrueVoteMD.org. "Maryland needs to join the rest of the country and recognize that the only way to have transparent, independent vote counts is to provide a paper record that is verified by the voter."
Miss Schade said that with close races possible in the gubernatorial and U.S. Senate elections next year, "voters need to be sure their votes are counted accurately, and that cannot be done on the current Diebold machines."
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Kerry's credibility questioned as fighting in Gaza rages
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in defamation case
- Rush Limbaugh: 'There is no journalism anymore'
- California's Jerry Brown cites God, 'religious call' to embrace illegals
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world