Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Spending … and identity crisis

It’s not possible, is it? Rep. Tom DeLay did not say the Republican Congress had achieved a “victory” over wasteful spending? What a sense of humor. This, just as Congress rushes to blanket the Gulf Coast thickly in taxpayer funds?

Who are these Republicans? A little more than a month ago, when House members were departing for the August break, the Republican leadership circulated a flyer listing 12 “Ideas for August recess events.” Among these were, according to The Washington Post, “stop by a military reserve center to highlight increased benefits,” “visit a bridge or highway that will receive additional funding,” or “talk up the new prescription drug benefit for seniors.”

That sound you hear (is it a ka-ching?) is the sound of Republican principle melting in the hot sun of Washington, D.C. Gone is the heady talk from the days of the Republican Revolution in 1994, when whole departments and agencies were to be eliminated. Today, the corpulent state gobbles up taxpayers’ money, and Republicans declare no “offsets” can be found for the new spending natural disasters will require.

Nonmilitary and non-homeland security spending rose by $303 billion between 2001 and 2005, the American Conservative Union says. Only eight House members and 11 senators voted against the $286.5 billion transportation bill in August, the most lavish public works bill in U.S. history. The Washington Post reports the mammoth bill has 6,376 earmarked projects including “a $2.3 million grant for the beautification of the Ronald Reagan Freeway in California; $6 million for graffiti elimination in New York; nearly $4 million on the National Packard Museum in Warren, Ohio, and the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Mich.; $2.4 million on a Red River National Wildlife Refuge Visitor Center in Louisiana; and $1.2 million to install lighting and steps and to equip an interpretative facility at the Blue Ridge Music Center, to name a few.”

And now President Bush, whose greatest sin in his first term was failure to wield the veto pen, has joined enthusiastically in the legalized looting of the taxpayer. No one has any idea how much the federal government will spend rebuilding areas devastated by Katrina (and perhaps, though God forbid, by Rita as well), so the $61 billion the Congress just passed can best be understood as a down payment. Most estimates of total spending on hurricane relief now hover around $200 billion. But nobody knows. And Rita adds another huge potential loss.

President Bush’s Sept. 15 speech from New Orleans, while graceful and touching, had no hint of humility about the reach of federal power or government’s ability to get things done. “We’ll not just rebuild,” he said, “we’ll build higher and better.”

This is not a conservative perspective. The people of the region need immediate help and comfort, but why must we rush headlong into a rebuilding program, particularly one funded and controlled from Washington? Mr. Bush said, “Americans have never left our destiny to the whims of nature, and we will not start now.” That sort of hubris can get you into trouble.

Governments don’t know how to build cities. Besides, one might have thought Katrina had just taught a bitter lesson about thumbing one’s nose at nature. Would it really be unthinkable for Baton Rouge to take New Orleans’ place as the most important city in Louisiana?

Finally, there is the Democrats’ favorite topic — the perennial matter of race. Suddenly, Republicans seem to have an attack of amnesia. The president attributes poverty in New Orleans to a history of racial discrimination and proposes, as Stephen Moore coined it in the Wall Street Journal, a “GOP New Deal.”

In truth, as conservatives have patiently argued for 25 years, poverty in America today is primarily a matter of culture, not race. It is the result of family disintegration above all. Republicans have reduced U.S. poverty dramatically, especially that of black children, by welfare reform. There is more to be done, but not by adopting the liberals’ racism mantra.

Republicans seem forget not just their principles but their own past successes — and that is an invitation to failure.

Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Hail Mary Food of Grace

          Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.

          Ad Lib

          Are there profound differences between the Left and the Right? You betcha.

          Talking Sense

          We’re human: we don’t always think things through, so we accept many ideas that are, well, ideas that are wrong. We also look past certain truths without recognizing them.