The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

  • Politics

    Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

  • Commentary

    TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

  • World

    Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody

  • Politics

    Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska

  • National

    Poll finds stubborn suspicion of census

Monday, April 3, 2006

Favorable Medicare access

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • URS, Minnesota settle suit over bridge collapse
  • Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
  • Conan talking to Fox about talk show
  • Pakistan arrests halt U.N. contacts with Taliban

By

Saturday marked the end of the three-month transition of the Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage to private insurer formularies. Critics clamored that the switch to the new formularies was certain to create access problems and leave patients without the prescription drugs they need, but the facts do not support these dire predictions.

The Center for Medicaid and Medicare Studies analyzes formularies to ensure that the drug lists are not too restrictive, and that each formulary includes at least two drugs in each category, determined by widely accepted classifications. (Two drug options represents the minimum, according to CMS formulary guidelines, and more than two may be required "where additional drugs present unique and important therapeutic advantages in terms of safety and efficiency.") If a necessary drug is not included in an insurer's formulary, patients have been promised a timely ruling on their application for a formulary exception.

That there are simply too many plans for seniors to understand and evaluate their options is another common charge from opponents. Even with the myriad prescription drug plans open to beneficiaries, however, seniors are not overburdened by choice, two recent surveys demonstrate. The surveys, sponsored by America's Health Insurance Plans, show that of seniors who signed up for the Medicare drug benefit, the vast majority (84 percent) had no difficulties enrolling. And finding the right plan is worth the effort of shopping around, two-thirds said. For those who were automatically enrolled, 90 percent had little difficulty receiving their prescription drugs.

Through competition between providers, the Medicare prescription drug coverage seeks a balance between reining in the cost of prescriptions and encouraging pharmaceutical advancement. The benefit has been successful cutting the cost to consumers, with average savings of 57 percent with the lowest-cost plan and up to 42 percent with the median plan. As well as lower out-of-pocket expenses, overall growth in drug spending is expected to be slightly less under Part D.

The market-driven nature of this program doesn't force drug prices to unsustainably low levels, which would impede medical progress, the way that a government-controlled "single payer" system might do. The success of Part D is crucial, as the effectiveness of empowering consumers to choose between competing plans will shape future reforms to the Medicare system.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  5. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody
More Top Stories »
  1. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress
  2. PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone
  3. Elvis shakes up press again at Newseum
  4. Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska
  5. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  4. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody
  5. Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska
More Top Stories »
  1. CBO feels crush of health care requests
  2. Democrats make final push on health care
  3. EDITORIAL: Obama's medical horror stories
  4. Group condemns textbooks about Islam
  5. Poll finds stubborn suspicion of census

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Issa: Giving back a bribe for a vote changes nothing

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.