You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

Libby links Bush to leak OK

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff told prosecutors that President Bush gave his approval to leak to the press sensitive intelligence that would bolster the case for war against Iraq, according to documents filed yesterday in the CIA leak case.

But the court documents, filed by special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald, do not say that Mr. Bush or Mr. Cheney authorized I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to disclose the name of Valerie Plame, a CIA employee -- a charge that set the federal investigation into motion more than two years ago.

In addition, the purported leaks authorized by the president did not involve classified information because, Mr. Libby testified, an administration lawyer told him that the president, by allowing the disclosure of classified intelligence, essentially had declassified the information. The president has broad authority to declassify information under an executive order signed by President Clinton.

Mr. Libby, who resigned in October after he was indicted on five counts of perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI, testified to a federal grand jury before his indictment that he had received "approval from the president through the vice president" to divulge portions of a classified document known as the National Intelligence Estimate. Those sections focused on Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's purported program to develop nuclear weapons.

Mr. Fitzgerald wrote that Mr. Libby said the authorization from Mr. Bush via Mr. Cheney to release the classified information was "unique in his recollection."

The case began as an investigation into what Democratic critics called the "outing" of a covert CIA operative by the White House, pointing fingers at Mr. Cheney and Mr. Bush's top aide, Karl Rove. Accusations flew that there was a concerted effort to discredit Mrs. Plame's husband, Joseph C. Wilson IV, after the former diplomat wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times that charged the Bush administration with exaggerating prewar intelligence to heighten the perceived Iraqi threat from weapons of mass destruction.

According to the new documents, the Bush authorization through Mr. Cheney led to the July 8, 2003, conversation between Mr. Libby and New York Times reporter Judith Miller. In that meeting, Mr. Libby made reference to the fact that Mr. Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.

But it was conservative columnist Robert Novak who -- days later -- first disclosed Mrs. Plame's status at the CIA. No one, including Mr. Libby, was indicted on charges of revealing the identity of a covert CIA operative.

Yet the documents also point to Mr. Cheney's interest in Mr. Wilson.

"At some point after the publication of the July 6 [2003] op-ed by Mr. Wilson, Vice President Cheney, [Mr. Libby's] immediate supervisor, expressed concerns to [Mr. Libby] regarding whether Mr. Wilson's trip was legitimate or whether it was in effect a junket set up by Mr. Wilson's wife," the documents say.

The White House yesterday had no comment on the matter, and Mr. Bush ignored a reporter's question about the case.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, said he would formally request an explanation from the White House.

"The more we hear, the more it is clear this goes way beyond Scooter Libby," Mr. Schumer said. "At the very least, President Bush and Vice President Cheney should fully inform the American people of any role in allowing classified information to be leaked."

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said, "Now we know President Bush authorized the leaking of classified information for political gain. His willingness to do so demonstrates once again that the president puts his party above the security of the American people."

But at a congressional hearing, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales said the president has the "inherent authority to decide who should have classified information."

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** The Rev. William E. Lori, Roman Catholic bishop of Bridgeport, Conn., gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing: "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion & Freedom of Conscience." From left are, Lori, the Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, and C. Ben Mitchell, professor of Moral Philosophy Union University. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    Battle lines are drawn over whether Obama is waging a war on religion

    By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • President Obama exits Air Force One on Feb. 18, 2012, after landing at Andrews Air Force Base, Md. (Associated Press)

    Obama stays on ‘message,’ gets boost in ratings amid GOP strife

    By Dave Boyer and Susan Crabtree - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Omkara World

          Empowering mind/body/spirit and health dialogue along with cutting-edge, conscious social, political, and world commentary with Adam Omkara. Join the Evolution!

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.

          No 2 Religion Yes 2 Faith

          To give all religions due respect, but give none the power to control our connection with God.