Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Feds’ pay raise likely to be lower

If living costs jumped 3 percent just in the past nine months, then how can Uncle Sam, who invented the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), justify a smaller federal pay increase for next January? That’s what many working feds want to know.

This January, civil servants in Washington and Baltimore, the largest concentration of U.S. workers, got a 3.44 percent raise. That exceeded the increase in inflation for the year.

The White House wants to limit both the raises and the COLA to a total of 2.2 percent in January. Congress is setting up a legislative end run that, if successful, would produce a 2.7 percent increase next year.

Key to the question (if not the answer) is that retired federal and military personnel already are guaranteed a 3.1 percent COLA in January. And that will be worth even more if living costs rise either this month or next month.

The relatively short answer to the pay raise vs. COLA question is this:

The federal pay raise is based on a law (largely ignored by the past two presidents) that computes private-sector wage changes using a formula that would make Dr. Frankenstein proud. It puts Congress and the White House in the driver’s seat and pits them against each other.

Pay raises that the law produced over the past dozen years are more than Presidents Clinton and Bush proposed, but less than called for by the law signed by President Bush’s father.

Raises for retired feds and military personnel (linked to the Social Security formula) are automatic. They are triggered by an increase in the Consumer Price Index over the 12-month period starting September.

If your head aches, welcome to the club.

Bottom line: Politicians set the pay raise, whereas price increases on goods included in the CPI determine the COLA adjustment for government, military and Social Security retirees.

The system can and does produce federal pay raises that often are higher than the rise in inflation or, like this year, that are likely to be lower. But regardless of how much more you are paying at the pump, for a latte or for prescription drugs, a raise is a raise and a COLA is a COLA and never the twain shall meet.

Working from home

Efforts to maximize the number of feds who telecommute has been less than a resounding success. Despite a push from Congress and some agency heads, many managers are reluctant to let employees out of their sight — maybe, in some cases, for good reason.

The dozen-plus federal and commercial telework centers in the Washington area are rarely more than half-full. Even a tough nudge from Congress — meaning some agencies can be fined for failing to hit their telework goals — hasn’t put a dent in the daily rush-hour nightmare here.

Some feds say the much-publicized loss of data — names, addresses and Social Security numbers — from lost or stolen laptops could set back the telework program at places such as the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities