- Outrage as Air Force base in South Carolina boots Nativity scene
- Israel poised for a $173M boost from the U.S. for missile defense
- Leon Panetta named as source of ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ scriptwriter’s information
- Mandela service sign language interpreter: ‘He made up his own signs’
- Pope Francis named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’
- Ben Affleck: Fundraising for Democrats started to ‘feel gross’
- Vladimir Putin orders military to boost presence in Arctic
- Brooklyn, N.Y.: ‘Lesbian capital’ of the Northeast
- Elian Gonzalez: It’s America’s fault that my mother died
- India top court rules homosexuality is illegal
Bush caved to pressure on troops
President Bush only acceded to a jump in the number of U.S. Army and Marine Corps ground troops after intense pressure from senior officers, active and retired, including the Joint Chiefs, defense sources said.
Mr. Bush, who announced Wednesday that he will increase an active force that now stands at 1.4 million personnel, this month heard about the stressed Army and Marines Corps from a group of retired officers at the Pentagon.
But the deal-clincher came when he traveled to the Pentagon and met with the six-member Joint Chiefs inside the super-secret “tank.”
There, the commander in chief listened to a request for more combat forces from Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, and Gen. James T. Conway, the Marine commandant, said defense sources briefed on the meeting.
The Army, with a little more than 500,000 active soldiers, is pulling the brunt of the war on terror both in Afghanistan and Iraq. Army combat brigade teams only receive about a 13-month home-base stay before deploying again. What’s more, the Army is fast wearing out its inventory of armored vehicles and weapons and needs replacements fast, Gen. Schoomaker has said.
The Marines, who patrol the al Qaeda-infested al Anbar province, west of Baghdad, send 1st and 2nd expeditionary forces on seven-month rotations. Marine officers have complained of insufficient troop numbers to control the Sunni Muslim province.
The messages on a larger armed forces, but not necessarily a troop increase for Iraq, came in rapid succession earlier this month. On Dec. 11, Mr. Bush welcomed to the White House two outside military analysts and three retired officers, including former Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey, a critic of former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
Gen. McCaffrey said in a previous interview that the Army should be increased by 80,000 soldiers.
“We have inadequate Army and Marine Corps combat power to sustain this level of deployment,” said Gen. McCaffrey, who led the 24th Infantry Division in Desert Storm.
Two days after he met with the retired generals, Mr. Bush went to the Pentagon and later called the discussion “candid.” A day later, Gen. Schoomaker told a blue-ribbon commission on the Guard and Reserve that the Army “will break” unless the active force is bumped up. He suggested 6,000 more soldiers per year.
Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee have endorsed an increase of 11,000 Army soldiers, to 523,000, and 8,000 more Marines, to 187,000. On a trip to Iraq this week, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates did not endorse any specific numbers.
Gen. Schoomaker and Mr. Rumsfeld’s staff did not see eye to eye on the size of a budget increases needed to replace damaged equipment in a process called “reset.”
“Schoomaker wants everything replaced so every unit and every soldier is equipped to the max,” said an aide.
The good news for the president is that the Joint Chiefs do not favor proposals from Democrats to remove all 135,000 troops immediately from Iraq or to bring them out in a preset timeline. A defense source also said the chiefs “are cool at best” to the Iraq Study Group proposal to have virtually all land combat forces out of Iraq by early 2008, if conditions permit.
“I think one of the most important things the new secretary of defense has to do is realize we are badly underfunding the Department of Defense for the missions we have given them,” said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, an Iraq war hawk. “We are going to have to increase the defense budget significantly.”
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
News and views on the Civil War.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow