- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Bush caved to pressure on troops
President Bush only acceded to a jump in the number of U.S. Army and Marine Corps ground troops after intense pressure from senior officers, active and retired, including the Joint Chiefs, defense sources said.
Mr. Bush, who announced Wednesday that he will increase an active force that now stands at 1.4 million personnel, this month heard about the stressed Army and Marines Corps from a group of retired officers at the Pentagon.
But the deal-clincher came when he traveled to the Pentagon and met with the six-member Joint Chiefs inside the super-secret “tank.”
There, the commander in chief listened to a request for more combat forces from Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, and Gen. James T. Conway, the Marine commandant, said defense sources briefed on the meeting.
The Army, with a little more than 500,000 active soldiers, is pulling the brunt of the war on terror both in Afghanistan and Iraq. Army combat brigade teams only receive about a 13-month home-base stay before deploying again. What’s more, the Army is fast wearing out its inventory of armored vehicles and weapons and needs replacements fast, Gen. Schoomaker has said.
The Marines, who patrol the al Qaeda-infested al Anbar province, west of Baghdad, send 1st and 2nd expeditionary forces on seven-month rotations. Marine officers have complained of insufficient troop numbers to control the Sunni Muslim province.
The messages on a larger armed forces, but not necessarily a troop increase for Iraq, came in rapid succession earlier this month. On Dec. 11, Mr. Bush welcomed to the White House two outside military analysts and three retired officers, including former Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey, a critic of former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
Gen. McCaffrey said in a previous interview that the Army should be increased by 80,000 soldiers.
“We have inadequate Army and Marine Corps combat power to sustain this level of deployment,” said Gen. McCaffrey, who led the 24th Infantry Division in Desert Storm.
Two days after he met with the retired generals, Mr. Bush went to the Pentagon and later called the discussion “candid.” A day later, Gen. Schoomaker told a blue-ribbon commission on the Guard and Reserve that the Army “will break” unless the active force is bumped up. He suggested 6,000 more soldiers per year.
Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee have endorsed an increase of 11,000 Army soldiers, to 523,000, and 8,000 more Marines, to 187,000. On a trip to Iraq this week, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates did not endorse any specific numbers.
Gen. Schoomaker and Mr. Rumsfeld’s staff did not see eye to eye on the size of a budget increases needed to replace damaged equipment in a process called “reset.”
“Schoomaker wants everything replaced so every unit and every soldier is equipped to the max,” said an aide.
The good news for the president is that the Joint Chiefs do not favor proposals from Democrats to remove all 135,000 troops immediately from Iraq or to bring them out in a preset timeline. A defense source also said the chiefs “are cool at best” to the Iraq Study Group proposal to have virtually all land combat forces out of Iraq by early 2008, if conditions permit.
“I think one of the most important things the new secretary of defense has to do is realize we are badly underfunding the Department of Defense for the missions we have given them,” said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, an Iraq war hawk. “We are going to have to increase the defense budget significantly.”
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- ICT trade mission to Azerbaijan successfully completed
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CHELLANEY: China's game of chicken
- Inside China: Ukraine gets nuke umbrella
- EDITORIAL: The Potemkin website
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow