- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Lawmaker hits wiretap memo
Question of the Day
Another House Republican committee chairman has joined criticism of the Congressional Research Service for its legal analysis of the administration’s program of counterterrorist electronic surveillance.
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, wrote to the service’s director, Daniel P. Mulhollan, earlier this month.
In the letter, Mr. Sensenbrenner says he asked two legal scholars to review the 44-page Jan. 5 CRS memorandum on the surveillance program — which analyzed the administration’s legal rationale for the program as laid out at that time and found it wanting.
Mr. Sensenbrenner said the scholars, both of whom have reputations as conservative, “expressed concerns that the memorandum is based on an incomplete analysis of the law.”
Members of Congress, he wrote, rely on CRS for “objective analysis of legislative and legal matters. In doing so, I believe it is imperative that the various positions on an issue be fully discussed, which is why I am forwarding you the attached letters for your review and comment.”
Last month, Peter Hoekstra, Michigan Republican and chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, also complained about the service’s analysis of the surveillance program.
The memorandum examines the arguments of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and others that the surveillance program run by the National Security Agency was given a legislative basis by Congress’ enactment of the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, passed in September 2001.
“It appears unlikely,” the memorandum concludes, “that a court would hold that Congress has expressly or impliedly authorized the NSA electronic surveillance operations here under discussion.”
The Bush administration’s legal argument for the program “does not seem to be as well-grounded as the tenor of” their comment would suggest, the authors finish.
No one at the CRS could be reached for comment yesterday, but in the past, officials there have said the service does not comment on its correspondence with members of Congress.
Steven Aftergood, who runs the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, accused Mr. Sensenbrenner and his Republican allies of engaging in a campaign to stifle dissent.
“There is a big difference between allegations of errors and claims of bias,” Mr. Aftergood said.
“Everyone makes mistakes,” he said, adding that there might well be errors or omissions in the memo. “But it is a huge leap from that to say that the service or its researchers are biased.”
He said such a leap is “subversive in its consequences because it says that you have twisted the facts for malicious motives.”
The fact that Mr. Sensenbrenner had to turn to two “avowedly conservative” legal scholars for his analysis “suggests that the bias is on his end,” Mr. Aftergood said.
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- EDITORIAL: Red faces at the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- PRUDEN: 'Tis the season for apologies
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Southern Fried Politics from the Lens of a Persian-American Millennial
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Paul Rondeau exposes the propaganda, media tricks, and government policies that undermine our families, faith, freedom…and even life itself
Implement these actionable tips, how-to’s and best practices in 10 minutes or less to leverage online communications and technology for brand, business and career development.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow