- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. promised a panel of senators yesterday that he would dispense justice to the rich and poor equally and without ideological bias if confirmed to become the 110th Supreme Court justice.
His opening statement in the first day of his confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee borrowed a page from Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who said the role of a judge more resembled an umpire who calls balls and strikes than an activist-advocate for a partisan or ideological position.
"A judge can't have any agenda, a judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case, and a judge certainly doesn't have a client," Judge Alito said.
The statement also emphasized his humble upbringing and commitment to the rule of law, a point likely to be brought up by Democrats who want answers to questions about abortion, presidential authority and other hot-button issues.
"There is nothing that is more important for our republic than the rule of law," he said. "No person in this country -- no matter how high or powerful -- is above the law and no person in this country is beneath the law."
But Democrats on the committee -- notably Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts -- warned Judge Alito that he still faces questions about his handling of cases involving the poor and unfortunate.
Judge Alito listened to the senators with a blank expression, his head cocked slightly to the right. He is nominated to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is the swing vote on some of the most politically divisive court cases.
Judge Alito arrived at the Hart Senate Office Building shortly before his noon hearing after having breakfast with President Bush at the White House. He was greeted by groups of well-wishers who raucously cheered him as he entered the building. Appearing almost embarrassed, Judge Alito simply waved and mouthed "thank you" several times.
After raising a beefy right hand and swearing to tell the truth, Judge Alito -- an appeals court judge for 15 years -- was almost apologetic about the thousands of cases that he has ruled on and hundreds of opinions he has written.
"The members of this committee and the members of the staff who have had the job of reviewing all those opinions really have my sympathy," he said. "I think that may have constituted cruel and unusual punishment."







Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.