- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Davis did the right thing
Question of the Day
Antonio Davis did what any husband would do after seeing his wife involved in a spat with a man in the stands at the United Center.
Davis bounded over the scorer’s table, climbed about 10 rows up the stands and placed his 6-foot-9 form between the man and his wife, if only to defuse a snit that was possibly as much the fault of his wife as the man, depending of which version you accept.
His wife is said to be something of a diva, and Davis, regarded as a high-character person, no doubt acted with this knowledge in mind.
He did not behave in an unhinged manner. He was not looking for a fight. He was looking to protect his wife, either from the man or herself.
And you defend your family with strangers, no matter if a family member is at fault.
The potentially volatile scene resulted in a predictably swift response from the arena’s security force, and the only injury was to the wallet belonging to Davis after he received a five-game suspension without pay from the NBA yesterday.
The suspension, expected though it was, is as many as three games too many, for no man, not even David Stern himself, would not come to the aid of his wife if she were involved in a dispute with another man.
The NBA is rarely confronted with a thorny ethical dilemma, of when a player being right is wrong.
The NBA cannot have players bounding into the stands, no matter how valid the reason may be.
The NBA could not hand Davis a get-out-of-a-suspension card in sympathy. The NBA could judge the chivalrous motivations of Davis, and did. But the NBA could not give him a pass because of what it would tell the rest of the players, which would be: You are allowed to go into the stands if you have family there and invoke the Davis precedent.
The suspension never was in doubt, just the length of it.
Davis did the right thing, did what any husband would have done, but he will have to suffer the consequences of it.
And the NBA will study anew what measures, if any, can be taken to make its venues as safe as possible.
In the end, though, the NBA will find what societies always have found since the dawn of time: No matter how many laws, rules and regulations are imposed, some people are just not going to follow them.
And that goes double for those fans who believe the price of a ticket entitles them to behave boorishly, even around a high-maintenance woman in the company of her children.
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- ON THE RUN: Competition for Redskins backup running back is heating up
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors