- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
Maryland Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. yesterday said he will call for a special General Assembly session to revive a plan to phase in a massive electricity rate increase that died when the Democrat-controlled legislature adjourned in April.
Mr. Ehrlich, a Republican seeking re-election, said a special session is necessary because a lawsuit filed by Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley voided the governor's plan to phase in a 72 percent increase in the energy bills of Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.'s (BGE) 1.1 million residential customers.
"I urge you to join me in undoing the consequences of the city's lawsuit by enacting the rate stabilization plan we negotiated together in the closing weeks of the session," Mr. Ehrlich said in a letter late yesterday to Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. and House Speaker Michael E. Busch, both Democrats.
"This plan has already won overwhelming bipartisan support in the House and deserves the same consideration in the Senate," Mr. Ehrlich said. "If we are to regain the ground lost because of the City's lawsuit, it must be done in bipartisan fashion and without delay."
The governor did not set a date for the special session, but the rate increase is scheduled to begin July 1.
"Time is not on our side, however," Mr. Ehrlich said in his letter. "The higher costs of electricity -- and the anti-consumer plan adopted in the wake of the City's lawsuit -- will confront BGE's residential customers in just four weeks, causing undue financial hardship for many Marylanders."
Mr. Miller and Mr. Busch were not available for comment about the governor's call for a special session but, earlier yesterday, announced plans to discuss the issue at a meeting today.
The lawsuit brought by Mr. O'Malley, a Democrat running for governor, challenged a plan negotiated by Mr. Ehrlich and approved by the Public Service Commission. That plan sought to soften the rate increase by offering customers a 19 percent increase next month and gradually higher rates later.
Baltimore Circuit Judge Albert J. Matricciani Jr. ruled May 30 that the plan did not guarantee a smaller rate increase.
His decision prompted the commission to impose an outdated rate plan that starts a two-year phase-in with a 21 percent increase and charges customers 5 percent interest monthly on the deferred payments.









Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.