Political edge eyed in ports fallout

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen

By

The Dubai ports crisis appears to be over, but the issue is not likely to go away.

Members of both parties say changes are needed in the way the government approves such agreements, and Democrats are using the deal -- and port security in general -- to criticize Republicans during this election year.

President Bush repeatedly defended the deal, which caused a firestorm among lawmakers and the public, who were concerned about allowing a company from the United Arab Emirates, which had some links to the September 11 terrorists, to operate terminals at six U.S. ports.

"The American people have been shocked by what this administration has been doing, and we can run through the list of things that the American people have come to realize is basic incompetence: Katrina, prescription drugs, the war in Iraq, Leave No Child Behind -- and, of course, now this Dubai port scandal," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said on Thursday.

Facing staunch bipartisan opposition from Congress, United Arab Emirates-based DP World on Thursday agreed to back off and transfer its U.S. operations to an American firm.

The skirmish has allowed Democrats to push the argument that Republicans are incompetent on the issue of port security.

"It isn't a question of Democrats whipping this up," said Rep. Sander M. Levin, Michigan Democrat. The Dubai situation "demonstrates how in this important area, the Republicans were not doing a good job."

Mr. Levin said Democrats have been trying for years to get more money for cargo inspection at ports and that Republicans "have always turned their back on it."

But Republicans say Democrats are fighting a losing battle if they try to claim an upper hand on security issues.

"The Democrats are not going to make any hay out of this," said Rep. Zach Wamp, Tennessee Republican. "We're not going to cede one inch to them on who can best provide security to our country, here or abroad."