The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Bill Clinton urges Dems to pass health bill

  • Security

    Obama: No religious faith justifies Fort Hood shootings

  • Local

    Gov. Kaine clears way for D.C. sniper's execution

  • Politics

    EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate

  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at The Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

Wednesday, November 1, 2006

Marriage limits set to face stiff fight in 3 states

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Stories

  • Obama: No religious faith justifies Fort Hood shootings
  • Bill Clinton urges Dems to pass health bill
  • Obama to send more troops to Afghanistan
  • Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

By

Voters in eight states are expected Tuesday to pass constitutional amendments that define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. But in at least three states, the margin of victory -- if there is one -- may be razor-thin.

In Arizona, a recent Northern Arizona University (NAU) poll shows Proposition 107 squeaking by, 51 percent to 42 percent, which is "way too close for comfort," said Cathi Herrod of Protect Marriage Arizona Coalition.

The Arizona amendment has attracted huge public support -- more than 300,000 people signed petitions to get it on the ballot -- and survived a court challenge. But it also has been targeted for defeat by a well-organized coalition called Arizona Together, which says the amendment will hurt both heterosexual and homosexual couples.

Several polls, including one by Arizona State University (ASU) and KAET-TV, indicate the amendment will be soundly defeated. Recent ASU polling results, which show 30 percent of voters supporting the amendment, "reaffirm that Arizona voters do not want to take away health care from families," said state Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, a leader of Arizona Together.

Mrs. Herrod said NAU used the ballot language in its poll and is a more accurate reflection of voter intent. But she worries that the opponents' vigorous campaign and voter complacency will pose problems. "People think these marriage amendments pass easily. That's not true," she said.

In Wisconsin and South Dakota, polls have shown marriage amendments headed for defeat. Fair Wisconsin, which opposes the amendment, has promised to run "one of the biggest campaigns in the state in 2006." In South Dakota, a poll released in August showed the amendment losing, 49 percent to 41 percent, and South Dakotans Against Discrimination has initiated a radio and print campaign to educate voters about this "poorly worded" and "extreme" amendment, said spokesman Jon Hoadley.

But traditional-values groups in those states say they have no intention of losing. "There is just a groundswell of movement in support of this amendment," said Julaine Appling of Vote Yes for Marriage in Madison, Wis., noting that recent polls have consistently put them ahead by 51 percent to 53 percent.

Rob Regier of the South Dakota Family Policy Council said he can't explain polls showing a defeat for the marriage amendment, but he noted that at least one poll showed the amendment winning by a landslide. South Dakota voters are "still pretty conservative," he said. "I don't see South Dakota being the first and only state to lose a marriage amendment."

Polls in South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia suggest those amendments will pass. In Idaho, citizens lobbied lawmakers for more than three years to pass an amendment, and at least one poll showed a 2-to-1 margin of support, "so I think it will pass," said Marriage Protection Alliance leader Julie Lynde.

Colorado has two marriage-related measures that are expected to pass: A new Denver Post poll of 625 voters indicated a marriage amendment would win, 51 percent to 43 percent, as would a domestic partnership law, 47 percent to 42 percent.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate
  4. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  5. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. Gov. Kaine clears way for D.C. sniper's execution
  4. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  5. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution

Most Shared

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  3. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  4. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  5. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
More Top Stories »
  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. The siren call of Shariah
  5. Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  5. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
More Top Stories »
  1. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
  2. Jihadists in the military
  3. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  4. 'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort
  5. Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Hall, Portis on radio

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.