Michigan voters weigh race-based admissions

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

For up-to-the-minute results, news, and analysis, make WashingtonTimes.com your home for election night.

One of the more than 200 state ballot measures facing voters in 37 states today would end racial preferences in admissions to public colleges in Michigan, a state where such policies were confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court three years ago.

Others would make English the official language in Arizona; legalize possession of up to 1 ounce of marijuana for people 21 and older in Nevada and Colorado; and ban smoking in all public places or raise tobacco taxes in six states: Arizona, California, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio and South Dakota.

California's Proposition 86 would increase the state cigarette tax by $2.60 per pack and use the revenues for health initiatives, including tobacco prevention and control programs.

However, in at least three of those six states -- Arizona, Ohio, and Nevada -- other measures on the ballot are supported and financed by the tobacco industry to allow more smoking in public places and bar enactment of further smoking restrictions.

Although a broad mix of measures are on ballots this year, the press has focused primarily on five: a repeal of a ban on most abortions in South Dakota; a ban on same-sex "marriage" in eight states; a proposal on the Missouri ballot that would allow embryonic-stem-cell research; bids to raise the minimum wage in six states; and proposals in 12 states to restrict or ban governmental seizure of property for private use.

In Michigan, Ward Connerly, a former regent for the University of California who wants to end racial preferences nationwide, is pushing Proposal 2, which would end those policies in Michigan in three areas: public hiring, public contracting, and admissions to public colleges or universities.

Also supporting the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative is Jennifer Gratz, who made national news in 1997 when she sued the University of Michigan law school, saying she was denied admission because she is white.

In a 2003 ruling, the Supreme Court held that the university's point system for undergraduate admissions was unconstitutional, but it did not prohibit the school from using race as a factor in admissions.