- Vertical Group trader jumps in front of commuter train: report
- Brazilian goalkeeper who ordered girlfriend’s murder may be released to play soccer
- Harlem explosion death toll rises to 7; some still missing
- 2 dead, 23 hurt when driver plows into SXSW crowd
- Gaza militants offer Israel cease-fire of rocket blasts
- Pennsylvania Rep. Chaka Fattah vows to fight federal subpoena
- Ron Paul: CIA spying is a result of a distrustful, big government
- Mike Huckabee: Opposing abortion is ‘how we save this republic’
- Obama pitches to middle class with overtime pay action
- Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee claims Constitution is 400 years old
If and when Bush ‘Iraqs’ Iran
Mr. Gardiner reminds us air planners almost always fall short of promises — e.g., World War II, Korea, Vietnam and more recently Israeli air attacks on Hezbollah. “No serious expert on Iran believes the argument about enabling a regime change,” he says, and “it is far more likely such strikes would strengthen the clerical leadership and turn the U.S. into Iran’s permanent enemy.” Which is what President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad prays for five times a day.
Iran’s retaliatory capabilities are both regional and global. Hezbollah is the primary line of counterattack with terrorist assets in Europe, Canada, the U.S. and Latin America. Iraqi militia leader Muqtada al-Sadr has said publicly U.S. forces would be targeted if Iran were attacked. Sheik al-Sadr also controls the large 140,000-strong Facilities Protection Service forces that guard oil pipelines and other strategic objectives.
No sooner does the first U.S. bomb impact in Iran, mines will be sown in the Strait of Hormuz through which 40 percent of the world’s oil consumption passes daily. Iran also has sleeper cells among Shi’ite workers in Saudi Arabia’s eastern oil fields. Oil would quickly skyrocket to $200 a barrel. With prices surging to this level, concludes Mr. Gardiner, a “global synchronized recession, intensified by the existing U.S. trade and fiscal imbalances” would soon follow.
Syria and Iran signed a mutual defense agreement June 15 under which Syrian forces would be involved if Iran were attacked. Such a crisis could quickly escalate into a regional war.
Unlike the six months’ preparations for Operation Desert Field and the deployments that preceded Iraqi Freedom, the Iran buildup will “not be a major CNN event.” They will take place below the media’s radar screen, such as moving Air Force tankers to staging bases and additional Navy assets to the region. “We can expect the number of administration references to Iran to significantly increase,” Mr. Gardiner wrote, with three principal themes — Iran’s nuclear program, terrorism, the threat to Israel’s existence, and the Iran-al Qaeda link.
Congressional approval? When Democratic members of Congress offered an amendment to the Defense bill in June that would have required the president to get authorization before taking military action, the amendment failed. A strike on Iran, as seen by the White House, has already been authorized. It’s part of the global war on terrorism. So the strike on Iran could be ordered any time in the next two years.
Arnaud de Borchgrave is editor at large of The Washington Times and of United Press International.
By Emily Miller
Obama is losing the debate on gun ownership, concealed-carry permits
- Oil rig worker says he saw missing plane go down: report
- GOP bill tries to pull courts into fight with Obama on executive power, enforcing laws
- MILLER: Law enforcement realizes good people with guns deter crime
- Redskins' secondary holes remain unfilled amid NFL free-agent frenzy
- F-35 secrets now showing up in chinas stealth fighter
- Ben Carson: America's now 'very much like Nazi Germany'
- NRA shirt gets N.Y. high school student suspended
- Ukrainian PM accuses Putin of wanting war
- Malaysia: No debris in area shown on China images
- Critics point to Obama's attempts to sell health care as no laughing matter
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again