The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Bachmann: Pelosi has 'eternity' to get votes

  • Politics

    Price tag in hand, Dems prepare for final health care vote

  • Politics

    Kucinich drops opposition to health bill

  • Politics

    Obama dismisses procedural tactics

  • Editorials

    EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow

  • Politics

    CBO feels crush of health care requests

Friday, October 27, 2006

Doubts linger on feasibility of barrier

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • 'Jihad Jane' pleads not guilty in terror plot
  • Bernanke lobbies to keep control of banking oversight
  • Group condemns textbooks about Islam
  • Kucinich drops opposition to health bill

By

Both proponents and opponents of 700 miles of fences along the U.S.-Mexico border question whether the Bush administration can deliver the barriers -- whose exact location, price tag and construction start date remain unknown.

The Secure Fence Act, signed yesterday by President Bush, does not require the government to show any results of fence construction until May 2008 and while it does specify where along the 1,951-mile U.S.-Mexico border the barriers should go, there's no guarantee they ever will.

State legislatures, governors, and city and county governments, along with Indian tribal councils, have veto power over fencing locations.

"Even if Congress funds the construction of 700 miles of border fencing -- and that is a big if -- the fence will do nothing to stem the tide of illegal immigration," said T.J. Bonner, a 28-year U.S. Border Patrol veteran and president of the National Border Patrol Council, which represents all 10,000 of the agency's non-supervisory personnel.

The fence act calls for 698 miles of border fences, along with lighting, roads, sensors, cameras and other security devices. A separate $33.8 billion Homeland Security funding bill signed by Mr. Bush on Oct. 10 authorizes $1.2 billion to begin building it.

But fence proponents and opponents agree that the $1.2 billion allocation is far short of the up to $9 billion it will take to build the proposed fencing. Congress has withheld $950 million pending a breakdown of how the money will be spent.

The fence bill also has irked the Mexican government, where President-elect Felipe Calderon has described the proposal as "deplorable" and outgoing President Vicente Fox told reporters in Mexico City he was "confident" the fence would never be built.

The act calls for the construction of "at least 2 layers of reinforced fencing to prevent unlawful entry by aliens into the United States," although it does not specify what type of fencing to build.

"At best, the type of fencing that is contemplated will serve as a speed bump that slows illegal crossers by perhaps a minute or two," Mr. Bonner said, adding that the Border Patrol would have to be increased tenfold to "to intercept these law-breakers."

Mr. Bonner said experience has "amply demonstrated" that increases and declines in the number of illegal aliens coming across the border "are almost exclusively influenced by the amount of law-enforcement personnel assigned to an area rather than the length or type of fences and barriers."

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  2. CBO feels crush of health care requests
  3. KOFFMAN: A prescription for life or death?
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama's medical horror stories
  5. Medical pot lights up D.C. debate
More Top Stories »
  1. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
  3. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  4. Netanyahu woos Obama after fracas
  5. Illinois GOP borrows Brown's strategy in bid for Obama seat

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  2. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  3. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  4. Kucinich will vote for health care reform
  5. CBO feels crush of health care requests
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's medical horror stories
  2. White House urged to end Israel row on settlements
  3. Napolitano shifts policy on border fence
  4. Obama dismisses procedural tactics
  5. 'Self-executing rule' decried as a 'trick'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Catholic Church going easy on pro-choice reps and senators?

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.