Injustice? Look at your contract, Etan

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Etan Thomas supports the troops but not the war in Iraq, which is not unlike supporting the Wizards but not the games in the NBA.

The contradiction eludes the morally smug.

The far-left politics of Thomas are well-known, and his objections to the Bush administration and all things Republican are usually about as subtle as a sledgehammer.

It should come as no surprise then that Thomas took exception to Team USA's various functions with members of the U.S. military last month.

He thought it tasteless, exploitive, if not a sign of USA Basketball's tacit approval of America's war on terror.

He questioned the practice of having wounded veterans speak to the players, as if culling the insights of the brave and noble was somehow wrong.

Would any company or group seeking the wisdom of a wounded veteran be wrong as well?

Do these wounded veterans not possess a unique character that would be helpful to those in a wide range of endeavors, such as a company looking to improve morale and the bottom line?

It is doubtful Thomas would have an objection to a wounded veteran speaking in an anti-war forum.

"I don't have a problem with the troops talking to the players on their own," Thomas told the Nation magazine. "But for them being brought in to build a better basketball team just feels wrong. If I was there, my reaction would have been completely different. The fact that [Capt.] Scott Smiley has lost his sight would not have made me feel patriotic pride. It would have made me feel ashamed, angered and saddened that this soldier was blinded at the service of a war we shouldn't have been in in the first place."