The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story

Kudos to Joe Biden

By

Originally published 10:14 p.m., April 1, 2007, updated 12:00 a.m., April 2, 2007

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Six-term Democratic Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware has a rhetorical reputation for shooting from the hip. But Mr. Biden wasn't doing that during two war-related speeches he delivered Wednesday. First at a presidential forum hosted by the AFL-CIO and then on the Senate floor, even as the House and Senate had become mired in bipartisan warfare over Iraq, Mr. Biden displayed remarkable leadership. His action resulted in the bipartisan embrace of a policy that will help to protect the lives of tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers and Marines fighting in Iraq.

"If [the armed forces] build a new type of Humvee called an MRAP [Mine Resistant Ambush Protected] vehicle," he informed the union members, "there is four times less possibility of injury to a soldier inside that vehicle." This is crucial because 70 percent of American casualties in Iraq are caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs), the roadway bombs that often detonate underneath the flat-bottom un-armored Humvees. MRAPs have a blast-resistant V-shaped hull that displaces much of the explosive power of IEDs. "We need 7,700 [MRAPs]," Mr. Biden continued. "We're only going to build 2,000 of them this year because it costs $8.5 billion," he said with evident disgust.

"What in the hell are we doing?" the senator demanded to know. "How can we justify anything, anything we do before we spend that money now to put these kids in those vehicles?" Because each MRAP transports four to 12 troops, accelerating this year's production by 2,500 vehicles would "affect from 10,000 to 30,000 lives in the next six months," he explained. "We're sitting here making no sacrifices, making no sounds about the urgency of doing that?"

For Mr. Biden, the issue proved to be much more than merely rhetorical. Later that night, on the floor of the United States Senate, Mr. Biden introduced an amendment to increase the production of MRAPs by 2,500 vehicles before Oct. 1. The amendment was attached to the 2007 Iraq and Afghanistan supplemental spending bill, which had already ignited partisan warfare in the Congress and throughout Washington. "I have never begun a discussion of an amendment," Mr. Biden told his fellow senators, "by saying something as graphic and as drastic as 'this is literally a matter of life and death.' But it is. This is not hyperbole. This is not an exaggeration." He was right on all counts.

Mr. Biden quoted a March 1 memo from Marine Corps Gen. James Conway to Marine Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: "Getting the MRAP into Al Anbar province is my number one unfilled warfighting requirement at this time," Gen. Conway declared. Several hours before Mr. Biden spoke on the Senate floor, Gen. Conway told the senator in a phone conversation that getting sufficient MRAPs to his Marines in Iraq was "a moral imperative."

During a March 14 Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Sen. Byron Dorgan asked Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Schoomaker: "Why would we not do everything to mobilize, to move as many [MRAPs] into the field as possible?" Gen. Schoomaker replied: "We can build what we can get the funds to build. It's strictly an issue of money."

"If there is any place we should not consider the cost -- emphasize again: not consider the cost," Mr. Biden implored his colleagues, "it is when there is a consensus that what we are purchasing can save lives." The next day, by a vote of 98-0, a bipartisan Senate followed Mr. Biden's wartime leadership and embraced his initiative.

Very well done, Sen. Biden.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments
Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  6. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws

Most Shared

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  5. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  6. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  9. YON: Girl with no future
  10. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Top Pentagon commander in Afghanistan

An American victory

Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill

Ensign's parents gave mistress's family $96k

PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills

EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade

Senate delays climate bill until September

GOP's Kirk seeks Obama's old seat

Washington in 5 minutes

Firm touts 'safer' laser dazzlers

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.