


A stealth pay raise in January?
By law, federal workers and uniformed military personnel get regular pay raises each January. The 2008 increase is likely to be at least 3 percent before locality adjustments, as budgeted by President Bush.
There is a good chance that the Democrat-controlled Congress will boost that amount to 3.5 percent or even 4 percent.
Just about everyone in government — except employees of the U.S. Postal Service and top federal executives — will get the January increase automatically with a component for folks in 30-plus localities, including Washington-Baltimore.
But there’s more for a lot of people.
In addition to the regular January pay raise, which everyone gets at the same time, slightly more than half of the white-collar federal work force will get a within-grade raise, or WIG, that will also be worth 3 percent. It’s an increase based on years of service. Most civil service grades have 10 steps.
Workers get a 3 percent raise for each of the first three years of satisfactory service. In the next three steps, they get that 3 percent raise every two years, and in the upper ranges of the grade they get a raise every three years.
Thanks to the miracle of compounding, each within-grade raise boosts the value of future pay increases, the amount workers and their agencies can contribute to their Thrift Savings Plan accounts, the value of their annual leave if they cash out time when they retire, and the retirement annuity itself.
Critics of WIGs, beginning with the Carter administration, call them “being there” raises that people get for showing up for work, rather than for outstanding performance.
Better than 99 percent of all feds get a within-grade raise, based on satisfactory or other service and time in grade. That, critics say, makes them virtually automatic.
Whether you love or hate the idea of WIGs, they are an important part of life in the federal service and a valuable but little-recognized benefit.
The Clinton administration wanted to eliminate within-grade raises, and the Bush administration is trying to do it through a variety of pay-for-performance systems tailored for different federal agencies. Most people endorse the idea of merit pay, but many say that it simply won’t work in government — and doesn’t work that well in the private sector — because bosses would play favorites.
In the government, WIG advocates argue, eliminating the raises would mean a return to the spoils system by giving political bosses a financial hammerlock on workers.
Love ‘em or hate ‘em, WIGs are out there, and like a good wig, most people don’t even notice them.
Oversight or straitjacket
View Entire StoryBy Timothy Stanley
Pat's suspension completes liberal network's divorce from reality

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...

By Susan Crabtree - The Washington Times
Six members of the House Ethics Committee including its chairman have recused themselves from any ...

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
President Obama purchased lunch at a San Francisco restaurant that serves shark fin soup, after ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.

Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.

The Red Thread is written for that special tribe: adoptive families and those who hope to be.