Pelosi defends visit to Mideast

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday defended her whirlwind Middle East peace mission in the face of wide criticism about her choice of words -- and fashion -- during the trip.

The California Democrat, who touted her visit abroad as fostering diplomacy and following the Iraq Study Group's recommendation, said yesterday she is spreading "President Bush's message" of anti-terrorism.

The Bush administration and others all week accused her of overstepping her bounds and making critical gaffes as she, five other Democrats and one Republican met with heads of state in Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian territories. The lawmakers' goal was to stimulate a regional solution for a peaceful end to the Iraq war.

The speaker's visit with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus, over Mr. Bush's objections, drew the most ire. It prompted the Wall Street Journal editorial board to wonder whether Mrs. Pelosi was trying to embarrass the president.

Mr. Bush called the trip counterproductive and Vice President Dick Cheney said he was "disappointed" in Mrs. Pelosi, calling her actions in Damascus a signal that the U.S. is rewarding Mr. Assad for his "bad behavior."

But the speaker told the Associated Press yesterday she thinks the visit proved U.S. leaders are united against terrorism.

"Our message was President Bush's message," she told AP. "The funny thing is, I think we may have even had a more powerful impact with our message because of the attention that was called to our trip.

"It became clear to President Assad that even though we have our differences in the United States, there is no division between the president and the Congress and the Democrats on the message we wanted him to receive."

Mrs. Pelosi also attracted negative headlines for telling Mr. Assad that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert sent a message with her that he was "ready to engage" in peace talks, a claim Mr. Olmert quickly refuted.

The Washington Post editorial board called the trip "foolish" and an "attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president."