- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
The White House's endorsement last week of a Republican-crafted stem-cell research bill that its authors say doesn't promote the destruction of embryos could doom a more liberal version for the second consecutive year.
The Democratic bill, sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, proposed to expand funding for researching all new lines of human embryonic stem cells, regardless of their age.
Proponents say the Nevada Democrat's bill could jump-start research that potentially could save millions of lives, while critics say it's an unethical and immoral use of government money.
President Bush has promised to veto it.
But Republican Sens. Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Johnny Isakson of Georgia have drafted what they say is a compromise bill that skirts the moral and ethical dilemma of destroying human embryos for research.
With the administration's endorsement, some Republicans who may have considered supporting Mr. Reid's bill could throw their support to the alternative bill, said Don Stewart, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican.
"It seems to be you have two options: one bill that will get vetoed and one that has a chance to pass into law," Mr. Stewart said. "I think the choice is easy."
Mr. Reid's bill appears to have at least 60 supporters. But whether it has the required 67 votes to override a veto is uncertain.
Mr. Stewart said late last week that it was too early to estimate how many votes each bill will receive. But he added that the White House's endorsement of the Coleman-Isakson bill has damaged the Democratic version's chances.
"The [Coleman-Isakson] bill certainly is a much more viable option than a bill that won't get signed," Mr. Stewart said.







Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.