You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

Bush avoids endorsing GOP stance on aliens

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

As important as what President Bush said yesterday on the U.S.-Mexico border is what he left out, according to those who follow the issue: He did nothing to endorse the draft immigration principles to which the White House and Senate Republicans appeared to have agreed.

Mr. Bush also renewed his support for granting a path to citizenship, ending speculation that he was backing off a central piece of the Senate compromise reached last year by saying illegal aliens who meet conditions and pay fines "should be able to apply for citizenship."

"He didn't cozy up to the specifics of the PowerPoint, and he was really clear we need a practical answer that's somewhere between automatic citizenship, which nobody is advocating, and mass deportation," said Angela Kelley, deputy director of the National Immigration Forum, which wants Congress to pass a legalization bill. "If he wanted to close doors to people getting green cards, this would have been the time to do it."

The White House's PowerPoint presentation to key Republican senators two weeks ago shook the immigration debate. It seemed to indicate that the administration was taking a much harder line toward illegal aliens by proposing huge fines, requirements that aliens return home briefly and a much longer path to citizenship. It also suggested that future foreign workers not be allowed to bring their families or have a path to citizenship.

Advisers said Mr. Bush is using his public profile and speeches such as the one he gave yesterday to U.S. Border Patrol agents in Yuma, Ariz., to pressure congressional Democrats and Republicans to negotiate an immigration bill this year.

Still, he did little to bridge the gap between the parties. Democrats say he is squandering chances for an agreement by not taking a firmer stand against members of his own party.

"They are walking away," said Simon B. Rosenberg, president of the New Democrat Network, which has taken a lead role in pushing for an immigration bill. "They walked in '06 in the House and now this thing they're proposing is walking away from the bipartisan consensus that has driven this issue, and to characterize what the Republican senators are floating as anything other than walking away from the deal would be inaccurate."

Former Virginia Gov. James S. Gilmore III, a Republican who is exploring a presidential candidacy, said Mr. Bush is peddling "amnesty lite."

"That is just not acceptable and places an unfair burden on the American taxpayers and is an affront to the immigrants who came to this country legally," he said.

Rep. John Shadegg, Arizona Republican, who joined Mr. Bush yesterday, said a bill that allows a new pathway to citizenship "can't win the votes of a significant number, much less a majority, of congressional Republicans and cannot pass Congress."

Also joining Mr. Bush yesterday were Sen. Jon Kyl, Arizona Republican; Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat; and three other members of Arizona's House delegation. Absent was Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican. His campaign office said he was in Arizona yesterday but had scheduling conflicts.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Antonya Huntenburg, 21, of Hillsborough, N.J., a student at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, says everyone she knows is under some kind of economic pressure, including her parents. She says she joined the Occupy D.C. encampment on McPherson Square "to be safe." (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Youths show economic frustration in streets around the world

    By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** The Rev. William E. Lori, Roman Catholic bishop of Bridgeport, Conn., gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing: "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion & Freedom of Conscience." From left are, Lori, the Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, and C. Ben Mitchell, professor of Moral Philosophy Union University. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    Battle lines are drawn over whether Obama is waging a war on religion

    By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities