- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
Virginia isn’t for drivers (still)
Question of the Day
Virginia’s General Assembly has so far refused to open a special session to reduce onerous new driver penalties. But to judge from several legal challenges now underway, lawmakers may end up ruing the missed opportunity to change things before the transportation compromise falls apart entirely. At a minimum, its clear that more than just the penalties are under fire.
A lawsuit filed this week in Circuit Court in Richmond could upend the entire transportation compromise with a constitutional challenge to the powers of taxation it gave to regional transportation authorities. Meanwhile, within the last two weeks, a Henrico County judge rejected the constitutionality of the driver penalties, an Arlington Navy veteran sued over an outlandish $1,050 fee for driving 20 mph over the limit and yet another lawsuit in Arlington County is challenging the taxing authority of the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority. The whole transportation compromise between Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine and a Republican-led legislature faces a real risk of crashing down in a legal hailstorm. Six months from now, we might be asking why Richmond did not pre-empt all of this.
The constitutional tax-powers challenge comes courtesy of former state Republican Party Chairman Patrick McSweeney, who was joined by several other lawmakers and activists. If the courts hold that regional authorities cannot assess taxes as the plan arranges, then the whole painstaking compromise would need to be reconsidered.
While this is the biggest legal question right now, the driver-penalty issue is the one which truly gets people angry. That issue has rightly galvanized the public. Going 75 in a 55 mph zone is surely ticket-worthy but it is not necessarily “reckless driving” and it is not “abusive.” The law-abiding Arlington Navy veteran is proof of that. We heartily support having government throwing the book at motorists who seemingly have no regard for life or limb. Ordinary drivers who are caught engaging in ordinary speeding are a different story, however. The state should not be in the business of penalizing ordinary behavior with catastrophically large fines.
The odds of a special session look quite low right now. After all, these last few weeks have only witnessed a major public outcry over an obvious trampling of taxpayer rights. If and when judges rule the transportation plan unconstitutional, perhaps finally then we will see some real attention from lawmakers.
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq