


Elevator ears
That was Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, overheard on a Georgetown Law School elevator this week saying he’d like to move forward on an immigration bill, but he wasn’t interested in wasting his time for six months only to have his efforts filibustered.
“So,” observes our Washington source, who obviously rode aboard the same elevator, “if Senate conservatives can hold 41 votes or muster enough noise to make Leahy think he would be unlikely to achieve cloture, he might pass on an immigration bill this year. Occasionally, extraordinary bark can make up for a lack of bite.”
Unwavering
Kenneth J. Wolfe, Northern Virginia chapter chairman of the Virginia Society for Human Life, sent a note to Virginia House of Delegates member David L. Englin urging the Alexandria Democrat to “please vote yes on H.B. 2797 so all Virginians may enjoy the right to life.”
Mr. Englin wrote back: “Thank you for your message urging me to oppose Delegate BobMarshall’s bizarre and misguided H.B. 2797, which seeks to guarantee constitutional rights to embryos beginning at the moment of fertilization.
“I voted against this bill when it came through the Privileges and Elections Committee, on which I serve, and you can count on my continued and unwavering opposition to this legislation. This is just one more backdoor attempt to end abortion in Virginia.”
For the record
He came to Capitol Hill during the Newt Gingrich-led Republican revolution; he returned to Georgia last week to battle his cancer and lung disease from the privacy of his home, and yesterday he succumbed to his illnesses.
Yet Rep. Charlie Norwood, we now see, continued to legislate right up until his death. Inside the Beltway has discovered tucked in the extended remarks of Monday’sCongressional Record this statement from Mr. Norwood, dated the same day, Feb. 12, only hours before he died.
“Madam Speaker, had I been present on roll-call vote No. 74, I would have voted ‘yea’; had I been present on roll-call vote No. 75, I would have voted ‘yea’; had I been present on roll-call vote No. 76, I would have voted ‘yea’; had I been present on roll-call vote No. 77, I would have voted ‘yea,’ ” the congressman stated.
He didn’t stop there, stating how he would have voted in roll-call vote No. 78 (“yea”), roll-call vote No. 79 (“yea”), all the way through to roll-call No. 92 (“yea”).
Let the record reflect that his lone”no” vote was roll-call vote No. 81. Mr. Norwoodleft Congress, fittingly, mainlyin agreement. A dentist by profession, who also served a combat tour in the Vietnam War, earning two Bronze Stars, he was 65.
View Entire StoryBy Timothy Stanley
Pat's suspension completes liberal network's divorce from reality

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times
A 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday on accusations he planned to detonate a suicide ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...

By Susan Crabtree - The Washington Times
Six members of the House Ethics Committee including its chairman have recused themselves from any ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A collection of Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. to the beyond

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.