Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Democrats try to stifle calls to ‘defund’ war

Democratic leadership yesterday sought to quell voices within their own party who want to “defund” the war in Iraq, while Republicans said that is exactly what the majority party intends to do.

The House continued its three-day, 36-hour debate on a nonbinding resolution to oppose President Bush’s plan to send more than 21,000 additional U.S. troops to Iraq.

“Some assert that this resolution is a first step to defunding our troops in the field. This is categorically false,” said Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat. “While the new majority will explore other opportunities to affect Iraq policy, our commitment to our men and women in harm’s way is unwavering.”

House Republicans accused Democrats of providing encouragement to the nation’s terrorist enemies and emphasized statements from the more liberal anti-war wing of the Democratic Party that are at odds with the leadership’s position.

Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, sent reporters a video montage of nine Democrats who, in various forms on Tuesday, called for a cutoff of funds for the war in Iraq.

“Congress must deny any more funds for the war,” said Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio.

“The real test for this Congress will be whether or not we continue to fund this war,” said Rep. Maxine Waters of California, the founder and chairman of the Out of Iraq Congressional Caucus.

The Republican-produced video, available publicly at YouTube.com, ended with a warning: “Does anyone really believe Democrats don’t plan to cut off funding for America’s troops?”

Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith said Republicans will win the public opinion battle if Democrats cut off funds.

“The American people will not tolerate Democrats who attempt to undermine our troops when they are in harm’s way,” Mr. Smith said.

The Democratic leadership appeared determined to take a less politically risky route: reducing U.S. involvement in Iraq gradually.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, and Mr. Hoyer reportedly are working with Rep. John P. Murtha, Pennsylvania Democrat, on a plan to attach restrictions to supplemental appropriations for the Defense Department.

Mr. Murtha, chairman of the Appropriations defense subcommittee, is exploring ways to restrict the use of funds allocated for troop increases. One measure would require combat training certification for all troops; another would require adequate equipment. Anti-war Democrats hope these criteria will hamstring deployment of more troops.

Mr. Murtha is set to announce his strategy in an interview with former Rep. Tom Andrews, Maine Democrat, at 11 a.m. today on MoveCongress.org, an anti-war Web site started by Mr. Andrews.

Mrs. Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, sent a letter to Mr. Bush yesterday demanding adequate equipment for U.S. troops.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who is running for the GOP presidential nomination, poses Feb. 7, 2012, for a photo with a youth as voters attend their caucus at Coon Rapids Middle School in Coon Rapids, Minn. (Associated Press/The Star Tribune)

    Santorum sweep: Wins Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado

    By Valerie Richardson and Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection uses qualified pilots to operate Predator drones for surveillance along the border. Under the FAA Reauthorization Act, drones eventually could be used by police agencies and private companies across the U.S. (Associated Press)

    Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • Supporters of gay marriage celebrate outside the James R. Browning United States Courthouse in San Francisco on Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012, after a federal appeals court declared California's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle, Lea Suzuki)

    Appeals court rules Calif. gay-marriage ban unconstitutional

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now