Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Gutierrez stands by U.S. ban on Cuba

Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez yesterday reiterated the Bush administration’s steadfast belief in the U.S. embargo of Cuba, despite congressional moves to relax the policy.

Cuban leader Fidel Castro’s hospitalization last year and ceding of power to his brother, Raul, as well as the election of Democratic House and Senate majorities in Congress have helped fuel speculation that U.S. policies could be eased.

Mr. Gutierrez, however, speaking before the Council of the Americas, said the United States must “stand firm” in its rejection of the Castro government and in efforts to deny revenue to the Cuban regime.

The question, he said, is not when U.S. policy will change, but when Cuba will change its policy.

“Years of foreign investment have not improved the lives of average Cubans, only the lives of those who hold power,” he said.

He said foreign companies operating in Cuba must pay the government in dollars for Cuban labor, but the government then pays workers in “devalued pesos” and “pockets the difference.”

Cubans, he said, “simply do not benefit from foreign investment under Castro.”

Mr. Gutierrez also rejected comparing Cuba to China, another communist country but one with which the U.S. maintains trade relations.

China, has pursued economic liberalization, and although that country has not made all the changes the U.S. would like to see, it would be more appropriate to compare Cuba to North Korea, Mr. Gutierrez said.

Legislation has been introduced in Congress to weaken the Cuba embargo, and two House members who are part of that effort criticized the administration’s stance after Mr. Gutierrez’s speech yesterday.

“What the administration fails to understand is that these policies only inhibit trade that is beneficial to American producers, depriving them of what was once among their 25 largest export markets for agricultural goods,” said Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, Missouri Republican.

Mrs. Emerson, who is co-sponsoring legislation to ease payment requirements on farm exports to Cuba, said the U.S. traded with the Soviet Union during the Cold War and has given most-favored-nation trade status to China, which she described as “the single largest owner of the U.S. trade deficit.”

“After 48 years, sanctions have yet to effect political change in Cuba. It is time to try something new,” she said.

Rep. Jeff Flake, Arizona Republican, who introduced a bill last month to lift the ban on American travel to Cuba, said Cuba is experiencing an “all-too-smooth transition,” adding that for all intents and purposes, that transition has been made, but the United States is “on the sidelines watching and having no influence, and that’s a shame.”

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Hail Mary Food of Grace

          Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.

          Ad Lib

          Are there profound differences between the Left and the Right? You betcha.

          Talking Sense

          We’re human: we don’t always think things through, so we accept many ideas that are, well, ideas that are wrong. We also look past certain truths without recognizing them.