Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

A new entitlement for illegals

Unsatisfied with thwarting a Republican effort to authorize $3 billion for a border fence, congressional Democrats are trying to enhance the incentive for illegal aliens to enter the United States by removing the citizenship requirement from the popular State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The Republican Congress in 1996 passed legislation blocking people who are in the country illegally from claiming benefits from the federal government, and when SCHIP was created in 1997, states were required to verify citizenship. But Democrats want to take that sensible requirement for Medicaid and SCHIP and leave it to the discretion of each state.

This reflects the Democrats’ eagerness to offer free services to illegals at taxpayer expense, undermining the principles of both immigration law and good governance. And it is also a step Democrats want to take toward expanding SCHIP, like their plan to expand its coverage to include children from middle-income families that make up to $83,000 per year — a plan encompassing more than 70 percent of American children. (When SCHIP first came into being it was only for families with incomes up to double the poverty level, or $40,000 for a family of four.) Expanding the program will cost $50 billion over five years; expanding it by giving states the option to not enforce the citizenship requirement pushes the price tag up even higher — although just how much would depend on how many states decide to include illegals in the program.

This doesn’t come as much of a surprise, of course, from the perspective of either immigration or health-care policy. Recall that SCHIP was born out of a failed attempt at government-run universal health coverage. Indeed, the Democratic expansion of SCHIP will actually allow children who currently have private health insurance to switch to the federally subsidized program, saddling taxpayers with yet another entitlement burden. In the wake of the defeat of the immigration amnesty bill last month, open-borders advocates are attempting to implement their agenda using a piecemeal approach. (Last week, for example, Democrats were looking for support for an agriculture-worker bill that included a path to citizenship for workers in the country illegally.) They should not be permitted to get away with using SCHIP to funnel more taxpayer assistance to illegals.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta

    How to cut $600B not on the radar at Pentagon

  • ** FILE ** A JPMorgan office building is shown, Monday, May 14, 2012, in New York. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

    J.P. Morgan $2B loss renews debate on size

  • President Barack Obama speaks at a fundraising event Thursday, May 10, 2012, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

    Obama, Romney use states’ rights as they see fit

  • Celebrities In The News
  • Banks

    Elizabeth Banks: Baby, film projects keeping her busy

  • Lynn

    Loretta Lynn: Turns out she married at 15, not 13

  • Kristen Wiig (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)

    Kristen Wiig: ‘SNL’ actress gets an emotional send-off

  • Happening Now

        Independent voices from the TWT Communities

        The Tygrrrr Express

        A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing viper

        Reawakening Liberty

        Reawakening Liberty features libertarian, writer and pundit Tom Mullen bringing forth observations and news from the world of politics, and life, today.

        Sports Around

        Contributions to the Communities Sports desk from readers.