The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Technology

    Study: D.C. area 3rd riskiest for cybercrime

  • Politics

    Landmark health care plan passes

  • Politics

    CURL: Bipartisan only in opposition

  • Security

    Navy warns ships about al Qaeda risk near Yemen

  • Politics

    Immigration advocates pressure Obama

  • Investigation

    Postal exec taps former associate for no-bid pact

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Genuine economic stimulus

Friday, March 9, 2007

Hagel expected to declare '08 bid

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Clinton: U.S. wants sanctions on Iran
  • California cops on alert for booby traps
  • Netanyahu nixes East Jerusalem building curbs
  • Senate rivals in Missouri vie for 'outsider' role

By

Nebraska's Chuck Hagel, the Senate Republican most outspoken in opposition to President Bush's March 2003 decision to invade Iraq, is expected to announce Monday that he will make a bid for the Republican Party's presidential nomination.

Mr. Hagel's candidacy could refocus the presidential contest debate, adding his Iraq doubts to those of former Virginia Gov. James S. Gilmore III, currently the only prominent Republican in the race who has been skeptical about the basis of the war from the beginning.

The question on nearly every Republican's lips yesterday was whether Mr. Hagel can raise the $100 million-plus that campaign analysts say will be needed by the end of this year to be a serious 2008 nomination contender.

"Hagel has a strong conservative record and great campaign skills, and if he could raise money, he could be a serious competitor," said Charles Black, who has advised every Republican presidential campaign in the past 31 years. "But his opposition to the president on the Iraq war would deny him access to the great majority of primary voters. Most of them support Bush on Iraq."

In Nebraska, Republican officials and operatives say Mr. Hagel could raise money as an anti-war Republican presidential aspirant, especially from the Omaha business community, which strongly supports him.

"He is very popular in Nebraska, and that popularity could translate into a popularity nationwide," said Nebraska Republican Chairman Mark Quandahl.

Most in the party agree with Michigan Republican Chairman Saul Anuzis, who said the constituency for a Hagel candidacy "at this point is probably minimal, even though he is bright and I like him personally."

Mr. Hagel, who has been a target of administration criticism more than almost any other Republican lawmaker because of his war stance, said on the Senate floor six months before the invasion that the "American people must be told of the long-term commitment, risk and cost of this undertaking ... [and] not be seduced by the expectations of 'dancing in the streets' after Saddam's regime has fallen."

Vice President Dick Cheney told Newsweek last month that while he believes in Ronald Reagan's "11th commandment" against speaking ill of a fellow Republican, "it's very hard sometimes to adhere to that where Chuck Hagel is involved."

In 2002, Mr. Hagel said the Senate "should spend more time debating the cost and extent of this commitment, the risks we may face in a military engagement with Iraq, the implications of the precedent of U.S. military action for regime change, and the likely character and challenges of a post-Saddam Iraq."

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  3. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  4. HANSON: Proud to help -- and to fly our flag
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
More Top Stories »
  1. BERMAN: Charities behaving badly
  2. Maryland not dying to be Dixie
  3. EDITORIAL: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare
  4. STEYN: 'Deemocracy' in action
  5. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  5. Obama urges Dems to come together for health care
More Top Stories »
  1. Landmark health care plan passes
  2. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  3. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
  4. Raucous buildup precedes health care vote
  5. CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Stupak sells out pro-life movement

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.