GOP claims House victories in parliamentary power plays

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

House Republicans are wielding the power of parliamentary procedure to score floor victories unlikely for a minority party.

The Republicans have employed a tactic to alter a handful of bills in the Democratic-controlled chamber, and yesterday their patience paid off when they caught the new majority in a pickle and blocked a vote on D.C. voting rights.

Republicans said it's the culmination of a parliamentary strategy they've been plotting for weeks.

"The first six or seven they have said, 'Oh, whatever, we'll support those, they don't mean anything,' but this is the one that jumped up and hit them in the face unexpectedly," a senior Republican leadership aide boasted yesterday.

Democratic leaders had dismissed the earlier votes as "not substantive," but yesterday's move angered the majority party.

Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland called the motions "gotcha amendments" meant to catch members in a political conundrum. "We are not going to play that game with them. When there are substantive amendments, we will debate them as substantive amendments."

He said yesterday's motion, which tied D.C. gun rights to the voting bill, delayed a significant measure, even though President Bush has threatened to veto the bill.

The tactic, a "motion to recommit," is a far cry from some of the political theater that makes for sensational headlines, and the technical explanation of sending a bill back to the committee from where it originated with instructions is more something a C-SPAN fan would enjoy.

Yesterday, Republicans attached language to overturn the ban on handguns in the District. Democrats, surprised at the last-minute language, postponed all votes on final passage of the bill indefinitely. Already, Democrats have allowed -- and voted for -- six motions to recommit offered by Republicans.

The leadership aide said Democrats made a political mistake by allowing their members to vote for measures they considered harmless, such as one that would forbid federal contracts from going to colleges that ban on-campus military recruiters.