The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Local

    Gov. Kaine clears way for D.C. sniper's execution

  • Politics

    EXCLUSIVE: Warner: Obama misplayed health care debate

  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at The Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

  • National

    PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil

  • World

    Envoy: Europe relies on U.S. shield

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Monday, September 3, 2007

Public safety chills

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: All the president's lobbyists
  • EDITORIAL: White House inspector general stonewalling
  • EDITORIAL: Chemical insecurity
  • EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall

By

After years of scheming, waiting, and investing forced dues into the campaigns of their handpicked politicians, Big Labor bosses believe they are just one step away from a big payoff.

Their goal is simple: Ram the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill (H.R. 980) into law by any means necessary.

Just before the August recess, under suspension of the rules, union-label politicians succeeded in passing the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill through the House.

Thanks to the union bosses' propaganda machine, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ran into little difficulty. Misguided congressmen from both sides of the aisle rushed to support the bill that union chiefs were claiming was "in the best interest of our nation." Nothing could be further from the truth. Today, the bill resides in the Senate, where the real fight could begin any day.

Unfortunately, in the private sector, current federal law already grants union officials monopoly bargaining power over all employees in a so-called bargaining unit, regardless of the wishes of state and local officials and their constituents.

But fortunately at least, until now states and localities have always had the authority to negotiate and set policies for their own public employees. Should the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill pass, however, the federal government would effectively mandate monopoly bargaining over state and local public-safety workers in all 50 states.

That means police officers, firefighters and EMTs across the country would be forced under Big Labor monopoly control.

Under monopoly bargaining, union officials are the so-called exclusive representative. Individual workers must accept union representation and are explicitly forbidden from representing themselves.

This prohibition, enforced by fines and firings for violators, is the very foundation of compulsory unionism.

Local governments found not to be in compliance with so-called core provisions of this legislation would automatically be put under the jurisdiction of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
More Top Stories »
  1. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  3. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
More Top Stories »
  1. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush
  5. 'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  4. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  5. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
More Top Stories »
  1. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
  2. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  3. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  4. Jihadists in the military
  5. 'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Zorn on radio

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.