The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Commentary

America's better way to fight poverty

By | Monday, April 28, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

In an election year, there is heightened debate and discussion about what issues are important to America. Part of this discussion focuses on how we spend taxpayer money beyond our shores. At a time when every dollar counts, Americans want to know what their money is doing abroad and if it yields a return for them here at home.

While it might not at first be obvious, the fight against global poverty offers Americans the win-win outcome they demand.

Americans want to know why we are spending money in faraway countries when pockets of poverty exist right in our own neighborhoods. Minimizing despair, hopelessness and resentment abroad, which can be breeding grounds for extremism and anti-democratic policies, are clearly in our interest. Fighting poverty goes a long way to enhance America's image in the hearts and minds of those we help, and to counter misguided stereotypes about our country, which are prevalent in many regions today.

A disturbing trend in the field of development makes me think helping the poor now, like never before, is more than just the right thing to do as compassionate and generous Americans. Development assistance is in America's national security interests. Seeing more and more nondemocratic regimes pour billions of dollars in what they call "development assistance" into poor countries is alarming, while they look the other way as these recipient countries fail to tackle corruption, or include their citizens in the political process, or make necessary reforms. It is what Moises Naim of Foreign Policy Magazine aptly calls, "toxic... rogue aid. It is development assistance that is nondemocratic in origin and nontransparent in practice; its effect is typically to stifle real progress while hurting average citizens."

Americans, to our credit, expect more from our tax dollars invested abroad to help the poor. We demand tangible results. We insist on accountability. We want proof that our aid is, in fact, reaching the poor, promoting reforms, protecting the environment, educating children, fighting diseases, building democracy, and opening markets, rather than lining the bank accounts of corrupt politicians.

In contrast, "rogue aid" perpetuates the cycle of poverty and expects no accountability, Americans want to maximize our assistance to break that cycle and create a culture of responsibility and, in so doing, prevent the consequences of poverty from reaching our own shores.

Reflecting American values of accountability and responsibility, the Millennium Challenge Corp. was established as a new, innovative way to deliver U.S. assistance to the world's poorest countries.

Millennium Challenge assistance is awarded only to countries committed to governing justly, investing in their own people's health and education, and supporting economic freedom. As a result, even before America commits to providing one cent of help through MCC, we often see countries embrace reforms to qualify for the money.

These countries are making tough political, economic and social changes by tackling corruption and encouraging the full participation of their people in the political process. They are changing laws to make it easier to open a business or own property. They are educating and immunizing their children and protecting their environment.

The Millennium Challenge Corp.'s approach to development offers a striking contrast to "rogue aid," and is the best hope for countries to break free from poverty once and for all, through their own will. That's why assistance — delivered in this way — is a core strategy in America's fight against poverty, and instrumental to America's interests.

I am proud that Americans continue to invest in a better way to fight poverty, and I trust America's next president will keep us engaged globally and moving forward on this path.

John J. Danilovich is chief executive Officer of the Millennium Challenge Corp. and a former U.S. ambassador to Costa Rica and Brazil.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  5. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  6. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  10. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Need for 21st-century upgrades

America's Morning News

MOVIE REVIEW: 'Bruno'

Hoekstra: 'Stand up to N. Korea'

LETTER TO EDITOR: On the hunt

Chaos theory -- and practice

EDITORIAL: Get Smart

Obama challenges Russia's strong-arm policy

Rick Warren envisions coalition of faith

WARREN: 'First father' calls dads to take action

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.