The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > World

Spy plan briefing rankles GOP

Lack of notice irks members

By Shaun Waterman, UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL | Friday, August 1, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

House Republicans on Thursday walked out of a briefing by administration officials about new rules President Bush has signed for U.S. spy agencies, complaining that details had been leaked to the media before being told to Congress.

"I didn't want to waste my time, or the time of the director of national intelligence," Rep. Peter Hoekstra, Michigan Republican and ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, told United Press International.

"You can't give me a highly technical, 40-page document, 15 minutes before the briefing starts and expect me to understand what's in it and have an intelligent discussion about it," Mr. Hoekstra said.

The document is a revised version of one of the better-known presidential executive orders - EO 12333. The order, signed by President Reagan in 1981, laid out the structure of the sprawling and sometimes quarrelsome collection of agencies that comprise the intelligence community.

But the document, which was last amended in 2004, became outdated when Congress created the post of director of national intelligence (DNI).

The revised version of the order "clarifies the authorities granted to the DNI ... in areas where he thought clarifications were necessary for him to further integrate the intelligence community," a senior administration official told UPI. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity on a conference call arranged for reporters by the White House press office.

Among other changes, the revised order gives the DNI new powers to remove or recommend the removal of some categories of senior officials.

The order also gives the DNI authority in two areas that have traditionally been the purview of the CIA and its director: relationships with foreign intelligence services and oversight of covert actions.

It maintains the decades-old prohibitions on assassinations and using unwitting human subjects for scientific experiments.

"It is a boost for the DNI," said Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, "but not a gross departure from the status quo."

Rep. Silvestre Reyes, Texas Democrat and chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said he supported the order's efforts to strengthen the DNI's authority "and end the turf wars that have plagued American intelligence," but he also echoed Mr. Hoekstra's frustration about the lack of consultation with Congress.

"I am deeply disappointed that the president did not seek congressional or public input into this document," he said, adding that the committee was only shown the order "after it was complete and on its way to the president for his signature."

Mr. Reyes pointed out that the order "will be binding on future administrations as well," adding that the committee would study the matter "so that we can advise the next president of whether this order should remain in effect or should be repealed."

Mr. Hoekstra said the final document had been available for at least 24 hours before the briefing, and "relatively complete drafts" had been available to "people within the executive branch" for at least eight days.

"Don't give it to me after you've given it to the press," he said. "This is the intelligence committee and they are talking to the media first. That's wrong."

Ross Feinstein, a DNI spokesman, told UPI that officials had "been briefing congressional oversight committees for the past 2 1/2 weeks on this executive order."

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

    Most Shared

    1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
    2. Croatia's leader resigns
    3. Fed money may benefit Russian-backed firm
    4. Obama's spending blitz worries Powell
    5. Cap and traitors
    6. Wrong-turn Obama
    7. Gingrich back with a vengeance
    8. Rick Warren envisions coalition of faith
    9. None dare call it Marxism
    10. Holiday marked by anti-tax Tea Parties

    Most Commented

    1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
    2. WH communications director leaving
    3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
    4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
    5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
    6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
    7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
    8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
    9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
    10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

    Poll

    Will you be traveling this 4th of July weekend?

    Market Data

    Advertising Links
    TWT Store
    • e-edition
    • Print Edition
    • Weekly Washington Times
    TWT Affiliates
    • Middle East Times
    • Golf
    • UPI
    • Arbor Ballroom
    • Washington Times Global
    • About TWT
    • Press Room
    • F.A.Q.
    • Work for TWT
    • Advertise
    • Sponsors
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.