The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Culture > Military History

Retirees must use caution choosing health care plans

SGT. SHAFT COLUMN

By | Thursday, August 7, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Dear Sgt. Shaft,

I'm really confused on what to do when I'm finally 65 and Medicare is an option. I am 60 years old and still actively employed by the federal government. I have Tricare because of my retirement from the military. I have FEHBA (Federal Employee Health Benefits Act) as my primary insurance and Tricare as my secondary provider.

It is my understanding that when I turn 65, the benefits change if I'm retired from the federal government. I have been told that a large percentage of the doctors in the Washington area will not take you as a patient because they will get less revenue. Also, a large portion of the Washington-area doctors will not accept Tricare as the primary insurance.

The question I have is, when I retire, should I drop FEHBA insurance and use Medicare B as the primary and Tricare (which is free) as secondary, or should I maintain FEHBA insurance (decline Medicare B) and use Tricare as secondary, or take all three insurances (one free and paying for Medicare B and FEHBA)? What is the best formula?

Thank you,

Michael R.

Washington

Dear Mike,

My sources tell me that the choice of medical coverage is very personal and one size may not fit all. However, you do need to realize that if you decline enrollment in Medicare at age 65, you will not have Tricare as secondary insurance. You will rely completely upon the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) because you lose your Tricare eligibility if you decline Medicare.

Many federal retirees who have eligibility for Tricare do enroll in Medicare and Tricare for Life (TFL) at age 65 and suspend, not cancel, their FEHBP. That way, if they don't like Tricare, they can opt out of it and re-enroll in FEHBP during a general enrollment period. If you ever cancel FEHBP in retirement, you cannot get it back.

Continue reading 12Next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  8. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.