- Article
- Comments ()
ANALYSIS:
The long-anticipated resignation of President Pervez Musharraf on Monday may not hurt the U.S. war on terror because the Pakistani leader had not done a particularly good job of confronting al Qaeda and the Taliban, U.S. counterterrorism officials and Pakistan analysts said.
However, Mr. Musharraf's civilian successors may have an even more difficult time containing the terrorism menace, the analysts said.
Mr. Musharraf "was never the indispensable man that George Bush saw him as and he never delivered on many of the promises he made to Bush," said Bruce Riedel, a former senior official on the White House National Security Council and author of an upcoming book, "The Search for al Qaeda: Its Leadership, Ideology and Future."
Mr. Musharraf, Mr. Riedel said, "practiced selective counterterrorism," pursuing a few top al Qaeda figures such as Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the purported mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, but allowing the terrorist organization to build a new sanctuary in Pakistan "that is growing by the day."
TWT EDITORIAL:Musharraf's resignation
The Bush administration relied on the Pakistani leader, who seized power in a 1999 coup, to help combat al Qaeda and the Taliban after the 2001 attacks in the United States. President Bush repeatedly praised Mr. Musharraf as a moderate and a strong ally.
In the aftermath of Mr. Musharraf's resignation, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called the former general "a friend to the United States and one of the world's most committed partners in the war against terrorism and extremism."
She said Mr. Musharraf "made the critical choice to join the fight against al Qaeda, the Taliban and other extremist groups that threaten the peace and security of Pakistan, its neighbors and partners throughout the world. For this, he has our deep gratitude."
However, Mr. Musharraf, who stepped down under threat of impeachment, had lost clout since he became embroiled in a battle with Pakistani judges and lawyers last year. His re-election as president by a lame-duck parliament was controversial and he lost more power after agreeing to step down as army chief. Parliamentary elections earlier this year resulted in victories for civilian-led parties who combined forces against him.







Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
Please login or register to post a comment