DAVIS: Mumbai tragedy: Beware of innuendo on Pakistan

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By Lanny Davis

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

There is enough horrible and tragic about the terrorist attacks and killings of innocent people in Mumbai (the city long known in the West as Bombay) in the last several days without some careless media reporting and premature accusations by Indian officials suggesting Pakistani government responsibility making matters worse.

Full disclosure: I represented Pakistan in the 1990s, have visited the country several times, and made many close Pakistani friends during the time I helped Pakistan recover hundreds of millions of dollars the U.S. government owed it.

It is not clear whether the government of India has actually made charges that the government of Pakistan was involved in the attacks or simply remained silent while certain of its officials anonymously suggested such involvement, broadcast through speculative media reporting rather than waiting for the facts to emerge.

For example, Saturday´s New York Times quoted unnamed U.S. intelligence officials that early “evidence” indicated that Lashkar-e-Taiba, a militant group based in Pakistani Kashmir, “might” have been involved in the terrorist attacks. (Kashmir remains divided between Pakistani-controlled and Indian-controlled territories, and Islamabad in years past has reportedly allowed militant groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba to operate against Indian forces from their base in Pakistani Kashmir).

The Times paraphrased the Indian foreign minister, Pranab Mukherjee, as stating that “early evidence explicitly pointed to Pakistan´s involvement.” Note the words “explicitly” and “Pakistan´s involvement.” But the actual quote from the foreign minister is a bit more ambiguous. He is quoted as actually saying, “Preliminary evidence, prima facie evidence, indicates elements with links to Pakistan are involved.”

“Elements” with “links” to “Pakistan”? That is pure innuendo. That certainly implies the government of Pakistan was involved, but it could also mean, simply, that some of the murderous terrorists happened to be Pakistani.

Exacerbating the innuendo suggesting Pakistani government involvement are references to the secretive Pakistan intelligence agency, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI. It has often been reported that in years past the ISI has supported, directly or indirectly, Lashkar-e-Taiba and other militant groups in Pakistani Kashmir supporting the reuniting of Kashmir as part of Pakistan. It has also been frequently reported that the ISI supported the Taliban during the pre-9/11 years when the Taliban controlled the Afghan government and served as a base for Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda.

But that does not mean the ISI, especially under the new democratically elected government of Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of the late former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, had anything to do with Mumbai.

Nevertheless, the Indian government at the highest level needs to control casual remarks by senior officials suggesting a connection between the Mumbai horror and the government and people of Pakistan. The times are too dangerous to get out in front of the facts - especially between two nuclear powers.