- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
LAMBRO: Obama needs to be flexible
As America fell deeper into the Great Depression after the 1932 presidential election, President-elect Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted nothing to do with Herbert Hoover’s economic recovery efforts.
FDR, who would not be sworn in until early 1933, stayed out of the economic debate entirely, deciding he would not act until he became president.
Not so with President-elect Barack Obama, who last week shifted from the hands-off posture of “we have only one president at a time” to “the work starts today, because the truth is, we don’t have a minute to waste.”
Not only did Mr. Obama give the green light to his newly named economic team and Democratic leaders of Congress to begin preparing a stimulus package that he intends to sign the day he takes office, but his top advisers had already been working behind the scenes with U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and the Bush administration to fashion the Citigroup bank’s huge rescue plan.
Mr. Obama’s Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner and former Treasury secretary and Citigroup board member Robert Rubin - with Mr. Obama’s approval - had been in constant contact with Mr. Paulson as they worked out the biggest bailout plan to date, in an attempt to save Citigroup from going under in a sea of bad debts.
All this took place with the knowledge and full approval of President Bush, who encouraged Mr. Obama’s more activist approach to the economic turmoil now gripping the nation. Mr. Bush has been briefing Mr. Obama on the day-to-day decisionmaking, and told reporters last week that “anytime we’re to make a big decision during the transition, he will be informed, as will his team. It’s important for the American people to know that there is close cooperation.”
Mr. Obama’s economic team consists of a curious mix of more center-leaning types like Mr. Geithner and former Clinton Treasury secretary Larry Summers, who will head the White House’s National Economic Council, and others who fall decidedly on the liberal end of the political spectrum.
Mr. Geither and Mr. Summers are proteges of Mr. Rubin (a co-worker of Mr. Paulson’s at Goldman Sachs) a thinker very much in favor of free trade, deficit reduction and growth deregulation.
As president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and thus vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Mr. Geithner has worked closely with Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and with Mr. Paulson in the bailout policies that the Bush administration has made thus far.
Rarely, if at all, has an incoming administration been more intertwined, relationship-wise, with the outgoing administration on economic policy-making.
Several important position shifts have been signaled in all of this during the past week - shifts that suggest Mr. Obama may be more flexible in some of his economic policies than anyone thought possible.
(1) It appears his advisers have Mr. Obama rethinking his campaign plan to slap higher taxes on people in the top two tax brackets who earn more than $250,000 - which would push the top rate to nearly 40 percent.
With the economy bleeding badly and unemployment threatening to hit 8 percent or more in 2009, this is no time to be raising taxes on anyone - especially that sector of the economy that’s responsible for most of the nation’s investments and venture capital risk-taking.
That means the Bush tax cuts will remain in place at least in the first two years of Mr. Obama’s presidency. Those tax cuts were not due to expire until the end of 2010 and Mr. Obama had said he would keep all of the lower-tier bracket cuts in place anyway. Now it appears the top brackets are safely in place, too, at least until 2011.
About the Author
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.