The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Local

Scientists eye offshore drilling

By Steve Szkotak ASSOCIATED PRESS | Thursday, December 4, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

WILLIAMSBURG | Scientists are beginning to assess what they know — and what they don't — about the environmental consequences of drilling for gas and oil in a triangular section of the Atlantic Ocean off Virginia's coast.

What they learn could open more Southern coastal waters to drilling.

The government began a two-day workshop Wednesday for researchers and scientists to discuss drilling's impact on sea life and commercial and recreational fishing, along with other environmental and economic issues. The proposed drilling would occur 50 miles from shore in an area believed to contain 130 million barrels of oil and 1.14 trillion cubic feet of gas.

"We have some of the top scientists from the East Coast here to inform us on the environmental information that's available as well as data gaps," said Jim Cimato of the Minerals Management Service, a bureau of the Department of the Interior.

Many of the scientists said climate change is just one factor that has altered some research that dates back decades. Science on some species is also either lacking or incomplete.

"Seabirds could be dramatically affected by an oil spill, but we have no data," said Scott Krauss of the New England Aquarium in Boston.

Mr. Krauss offered detailed research on the impact of ship traffic on whales and sea turtles and the "rising tide of noises" in the acoustic spaces of dolphins and whales. He showed illustrations of how the effective range of whale communication has dramatically shrunk in some busy seas.

The Bush administration has pushed forward with the leasing of waters off Virginia's coast, and President-elect Barack Obama has said he would support a limited expansion of offshore oil and natural gas development.

House Democratic leaders have backed that position, stating last month they would not seek to reinstate a quarter-century ban on drilling in 85 percent of the nation's offshore federal waters from New England to the Pacific Northwest.

Currently, virtually all Outer Continental Shelf drilling occurs in the central and western Gulf of Mexico.

Mr. Cimato said the proposed lease sale wouldn't occur until late 2011 or 2012.

"We have a few years to do some environmental research that would inform our resource management decision-makers," he said.

The offshore waters identified for possible drilling cover 2.9 million acres over a wedge-shaped region that is 50 miles wide nearest the Virginia shore. The area discussed by scientists Wednesday generally included a wider swath of the mid-Atlantic shore.

The area is part of a rich commercial fishing grounds that include scallops, crabs and an expanding shellfish-growing area off Virginia's shore.

Private fishing trips totaled nearly 14 million last year, and area beaches attract more than 9 million visitors, researchers said. Another area to be researched includes archaeological artifacts, such as shipwrecks.

So far, the area off Virginia is the only one identified by the government for oil and gas development, but Mr. Cimato said that could change.

"Certainly if we demonstrate that we can manage things properly and safely," he said, "we can show it can occur elsewhere in a safe way."

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Inside the Ring
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. Senate delays climate bill until September
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  5. Health, climate reforms hit roadblocks

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.