The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Business

SEC cuts conflicts of S&P, Moody's

By Jesse Westbrook BLOOMBERG NEWS | Thursday, December 4, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

The Securities and Exchange Commission, responding to criticism that Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's Corp. contributed to the financial crisis, voted Wednesday to reduce conflicts at credit-rating companies.

SEC commissioners unanimously barred those who assess debt from discussing compensation with bankers who seek a letter grade before they sell bonds. The agency also limited gifts from underwriters to rating company employees.

"An important purpose of these rules is to create a more competitive, transparent environment in which many firms can serve the needs of investors and issuers," said SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, a Republican.

Moody's, S&P and Fitch Ratings are under fire for assigning mortgage securities their highest AAA ratings and then maintaining them months after the home loans began defaulting last year. Financial companies, pension funds and money market funds that bought the bonds based on the ratings suffered losses after the securities plunged in value.

Lawmakers including Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, have argued that Moody's, S&P and Fitch are susceptible to client influence because the banks that pay them to rate bonds also sell the securities.

SEC Commissioner Kathleen Casey, a Republican, said the agency hasn't gone far enough in fostering competition for Moody's, S&P and Fitch. The SEC itself has contributed to the problem by making many of the requirements governing securities rely on credit ratings, she said, and that criteria should be removed to discourage investor dependence on them.

"The Big Three continue to overwhelmingly dominate what has to be one of the most concentrated private industries in the world," she said.

In addition to the rules curtailing conflicts of interest, the SEC said the ratings companies must publish statistics so investors can better judge the accuracy of their assessments.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • GETTY IMAGES
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox is under fire from Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. YON: Girl with no future
  4. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  5. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. Israeli know-how
  8. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  9. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  10. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.