The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Local

Virginia likely to toss overseas military votes

By Larry O'Dell ASSOCIATED PRESS | Tuesday, December 9, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

RICHMOND | A federal judge said Monday that he probably will not order Virginia election officials to count late absentee ballots from overseas military personnel but wants a solution before the next election.

U.S. District Judge Richard L. Williams ordered the State Board of Elections and the Justice Department to work out a procedure to ensure the timely mailing of ballots to service men and women in future elections.

Judge Williams said counting the late absentee ballots would not change the outcome of the Nov. 4 elections.

However, he refused to throw out the Justice Department's lawsuit purporting state elections officials violated a 1986 federal law requiring states to give deployed military members adequate time to receive, fill out and return absentee ballots before Election Day.

The judge said he would refer the case to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference.

The Justice Department says that to comply with the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, state officials should have mailed military ballots at least 30 days in advance. The agency also says at least 656 of the ballots were not even printed until 28 days before the election - 125 of them two weeks or less before Nov. 4.

Robert A. Dybing, an attorney for the state board, said the 1986 law does not impose a specific deadline for states to mail military absentee ballots. He said the law allows military members who don't receive a requested absentee ballot to cast a federal write-in ballot.

However, the Justice Department says the Defense Department's Federal Voting Assistance Program guidelines on state ballots should be mailed 30 days before Election Day, and other courts have adopted that as the legal standard.

Justice Department attorney Alberto Ruisanchez told Judge Williams that Congress intended the federal write-in ballot to be an emergency backup, not a substitute for a state absentee ballot. He said the write-in ballots are more difficult to obtain, especially by military members serving in combat zones.

Judge Williams said the state's inability to print and mail ballots promptly was an "inexplicable failure."

He also said if the 125 ballots were indeed not printed until two weeks before Election Day, then state officials violated the federal law and need to make sure it doesn't happen again.

The plaintiffs wanted Judge Williams to order a remedy for future elections, but he said the state board and the Justice Department were better qualified to craft a solution.

The lawsuit was originally filed by the presidential campaignofJohn McCain, a Republican. The Justice Department intervened and became the lone plaintiff after Judge Williams ruled that the campaign lacked standing to sue.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  6. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  7. YON: Girl with no future
  8. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  9. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  10. Pelosi's mouse slated for $30M slice of cheese

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.