- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Critics say abortion refusal rules vague
Question of the Day
The Bush administration has issued new protections to health care providers who refuse to perform abortions and other procedures because of religious or moral objections.
But critics say the new regulation is vague and cumbersome and would lead to patients being denied needed services and medication, including birth control, HIV testing and treatment, and mental health services.
The new "provider conscience regulations" are designed to strengthen existing federal laws that prohibit institutions from discriminating against individuals who refuse to participate in abortions or provide a referral for one. The administration's rule, issued Thursday, is intended to ensure that federal funds don't flow to providers who violate those laws.
"Doctors and other health care providers should not be forced to choose between good professional standing and violating their conscience," Health and Human Services Secretary Michael O. Leavitt said. "This rule protects the right of medical providers to care for their patients in accord with their conscience."
Violators could face the termination of HHS funding and could be required to return funds already received.
The administration estimates that health care providers will spend about $44 million annually in administrative costs to comply with the regulation.
The new rule takes effect Jan. 18 -- two days prior to President-elect Barack Obama's Jan. 20 inauguration.
Federal protection of provider conscience rights dates back to the 1970s and since have been amended many times.
Critics say the latest update is nothing more than a last-minute effort by the Bush administration to make it more difficult for women to learn of their options regarding pregnancy.
Several medical associations, state attorneys general and members of Congress were among the many thousands who wrote to HHS to protest the rule.
"This midnight regulation, issued in the last days of the Bush administration, undermines this country's fragile health care system, as well as patients' access to health care information and services," said Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards.
Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, criticized the regulations as an "eleventh-hour new edict (that) denies patients end-of-life care and family planning and restricts essential research initiatives."
Obama spokesman Nick Shapiro said the president-elect "will review all (Bush administration) eleventh-hour regulations and will address them once he is president."
Mr. Obama in August had criticized HHS after it announced the proposed rule change, saying they would complicate, rather than clarify current law.
"It raises troubling issues about access to basic health care for women, particularly access to contraceptives," he said then. "We need to restore integrity to our public health programs, not create backdoor efforts to weaken them."
But the administration insists rules will strengthen provider conscience rights without restricting health care providers' abilities from performing any legal service or procedure.
Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, called the administration's action "a huge victory for religious freedom and the First Amendment."
"This is also a victory for the right of patients to choose doctors who decline to engage in morally objectionable practices," he said. "The scope of conscience must be defined by individuals and not the government."
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- Doctor, 2 others shot at Pennsylvania hospital: reports
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq