- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
Why do retailers fear using the word ‘Christmas’?
Question of the Day
Perhaps the most bizarre manifestation of the Christmas censorship, however, occurred online, at Amazon.com. Mark Steyn, writing at National Review Online, reported that instead of a “Twelve Days of Christmas” sale, Amazon is having a “Twelve Days of Holiday” sale. And when a customer wrote in to complain about omitting the word “Christmas,” Amazon, incredibly, sent out a canned apology for using the word “Christmas” elsewhere on its Web site. It read: “Please accept our sincere apologies if you were offended by the use of the word “Christmas” on our [Web site]. Our intention in referring to Christmas is to give specific ordering guidance for a specific holiday, not to exclude other faiths.”
But what Amazon and all these brick-and-mortar merchants don’t seem to understand is, in shunning the word “Christmas,” supposedly in order not to risk “offending” the at-most 10 percent of the population who are not Christians or don’t celebrate the holiday, they give the back of their hand to the 90 percent or more who are and do.
A former Jewish colleague, moreover, noted that Hanukkah is a minor holiday on the Jewish calendar, and not particularly a gift-giving occasion, so what other “holiday” are these reticent retailers referring to anyway with their “holiday sales”? The winter solstice? Boxing Day? Festivus?
Making it all the more inexplicable, radio stations across the country program Christmas music - some of them playing nothing but - for weeks leading up to Dec. 25, and seasonal classics like “A Charlie Brown Christmas” and “The Grinch Who Stole Christmas” draw large TV audiences every year at this time. So again I must ask: Who, exactly, do PC-whipped retailers think is being “offended” (other than the usual ACLU types, who have made taking offense their raison d’etre) and why do their marketing and advertising departments insist on being Grinches?
Kohl’s and Rite-Aid deserve praise - and our patronage - for not following the retail pack mentality. If enough of us vote with our wallets in our last-minute shopping today and tomorrow, and let their staffs know why we’re there this Christmas season, perhaps the others will get the message, and put Christmas back in their “holiday” sales next year.
• Peter J. Parisi, an editor at The Washington Times, can be reached at pparisi@wash ingtontimes.com.
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq