The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Editorials

Cultural warriors

By | Wednesday, January 9, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Vowing to change is all the rage right now, as millions of Americans make their New Year's resolutions, so you'll have to forgive me for not playing along. But contrary to the thesis of The Washington Times' Jan. 1 front-page story ("Legacies bedevil aging icons/Cultural reins taken by young"), the legacy of the man whose shoes I am prayerfully trying to fill is not "going to start getting chewed up" — because the principles and passions on which James Dobson built Focus on the Family more than 30 years ago are just as relevant today as they have ever been.

The proof is abundant in some of the statistics cited in your very own story. Most young people 18 to 25, you note, want to get married, have children and find careers; counseling and advising men and women to successfully navigate their marriages, raise their children and balance their careers with their family life is precisely the business we've been in since Mr. Dobson's first radio broadcast. You also point out that the number of working mothers who think a full-time job is the ideal arrangement for them has dropped more than 10 percent in the last decade — a reflection, one must assume, of a renewed realization that nothing is more important than being there for your kids. That's been central to all we do since our founding, too.

A third fact you report — that young Americans wish there were less sex and violence on TV — hits on the sort of subject most of your readers probably know our organization for. But here are a couple of things they may not know: Less than 8 percent of our budget, staff, resources and time goes into trying to have an impact on policy issues through government officials and agencies. Even more to the point, Mr. Dobson's energy for defending the family against the culture's assault on traditional values, although it has led him to speak out often on public policy issues, has never been about amassing political power or influence. It's always been about keeping families safe, healthy and thriving. It's always been viewed as hand-in-glove with the other 92 percent of what we do.

Consider this letter one of our staff recently found in our archives. It's dated Oct. 26, 1988, and Mr. Dobson was writing to a friend concerned about Focus on the Family's increasing involvement in politics and policy. "Our movement into the arena of public policy is unsettling to me," Mr. Dobson wrote. "It is so easy to make a mistake in that dimension, and if I had my way, we would stay out of it.

"On the other hand, I feel that God has put us in a position of leadership there, and we would displease Him if we refused to accept the challenge. Thus, we proceed, with fear and trembling."

Now I wouldn't presume to speak for the men and women who have or soon will assume leadership from some of the other "icons" mentioned in your Jan. 1 story: be it the successors to Phyllis Schlafly or Hugh Hefner. I can only tell you what I plan to do, how I plan to wield the "cultural reins" that have been handed to me.

I'm going to do it the way Mr. Dobson did it, riding along the trail he has wisely worn. My commitment is his commitment: to serve and strengthen families at every stage of life — singles, married couples, young families, single parents, children, teens and seniors. We do that through everything from our Orphan Care Initiative to our Plugged In entertainment reviews for parents.

Will we still continue to speak out on public policy issues? Absolutely. But we will never be, as Mr. Dobson has never been, beholden to any political party or candidate. We will continue to fight for crucial truths like the sanctity of human life and the sacredness of one-man, one-woman marriage. And when other issues of import to the stability of families in the United States and across the globe are raised up — like the responsibility of Christians to be wise stewards of the Earth and its resources — we will make our voice heard with biblical principles as our guide.

That is the wonderful thing about having your work rooted in something greater than your own wisdom or the shifting sands of public opinion. When God is your guide, there really is no reason, or occasion, to be bedeviled.

Jim Daly is president and CEO of Focus on the Family.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  8. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. YON: Girl with no future

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Obama's prayer snub brings reproach

Prayer Day organizers pan Obama absence

Key evangelical 'flip-flops' for McCain

Pro-life groups slam Dobson on partial-birth stand

Marriage activists headed for Colorado showdown

Maternal girl?

Bush backs focus on Miers' beliefs

The devil in the details of Holocaust images

Dobson seen as champion by the conservative culture

Parenting pundits proliferate

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.