- The Washington Times - Tuesday, July 1, 2008

UNITED NATIONS | A top U.N. official said Monday that the world’s “big powers” have tarnished the world body’s image of neutrality, at a time when the United Nations is increasingly threatened by terrorist attacks.

Lakhdar Brahimi, a former Algerian foreign minister and senior U.N. diplomat who helped form governments in Iraq and Afghanistan, has just completed a survey of U.N. security in 20 duty stations around the world.

He told reporters at the United Nations that his team was told time and again by U.N. staff members that the United Nations is no longer seen as impartial.



“Wherever the panel went, they were told by the U.N. people - and this is not only in Arab and Muslim countries but in Geneva, Rome, Nairobi and Sri Lanka - that there is this phenomenon these last few years that the U.N. is not perceived by a lot of people as impartial and independent,” Mr. Brahimi said.

“What’s happening in the Middle East has a lot to do with it, but it’s not only that. The big powers are using their muscles to influence the United Nations and that the United Nations is, not always, but time to time does not speak on behalf of its 192 members.”

Mr. Brahimi’s 103-page report, released last week, was undertaken after an Islamic group affiliated with al Qaeda blew up the U.N. headquarters in Algeria in December.

Twenty-two people, including 17 U.N. staffers, were killed and 40 wounded in an attack that was foreseen by U.N. and Algerian government officials.

The survey touches briefly on Algeria, but also broadly outlines flaws in the U.N. security structure and culture, plummeting respect for the United Nations, failure by host countries to communicate and guard against threats to the organization, and a lack of recognition by the Security Council and other U.N. bodies of how their actions put staff in the field at risk.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The head of U.N. Department of Safety and Security, David Veness, who wrote his own confidential assessment of the Algiers bombing, resigned last week.

His inquiry makes clear that the Algerian government failed to take adequate precautions, and senior U.N. officials failed to demand protection even after an Islamic terrorist group began threatening the organization.

Particularly damaging to the U.N. reputation, Mr. Brahimi said Monday, was that it took a full month for the Security Council to demand a cease-fire when Israel invaded southern Lebanon in July 2006.

Mr. Brahimi’s appointment was the only way the Algerian government would have consented to an investigation, U.N. officials said on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

“I’m not sure that the choice of an Algerian to investigate the bombing in Algiers is ideally the best choice,” said British Ambassador John Sawers. “Clearly [Algeria] did not fulfill all its responsibilities. Had they done so, the bombing wouldn’t have happened. I’m not sure the report captures that fully.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mr. Brahimi, 64, gently rebuffed the suggestion of favoritism.

“I never thought I was picked because I am an Algerian. I think, vainly, that I have some other qualifications beside my nationality,” Mr. Brahimi said. He has led U.N. efforts from South Africa to Haiti and taken on dozens of diplomatic assignments for the United Nations.

Members of the Brahimi panel visited Lebanon recently, and made no recommendations about the U.N. facilities in Beirut, widely thought to be one of the more vulnerable buildings in the U.N. system.

The glass-walled midrise building was built by former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and is located in the heart of the capital, just steps from a major roadway and Martyr’s Square, an open space sometimes crammed with hundreds of thousands of demonstrators.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The United Nations has an image problem in Lebanon: The UNIFIL peacekeeping mission in the south is disliked by many Lebanese, who say it is an ineffective buffer against the Israeli army; its investigation into the assassination of Mr. Hariri and two dozen others is considered painstakingly slow politically tainted; and Security Council resolutions to disarm the Shi’ite militia Hezbollah is unpopular in southern Lebanon.

“We think that the United Nations is now under threat almost anywhere,” Mr. Brahimi said, noting that U.N. staff briefly pulled out of the Beirut building but then returned.

“We have some very good security people in Beirut, and they think it is safe to go back there,” he said.

Copyright © 2026 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.