The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Politics

Inside Blogotics

By Victor Morton (Contact) | Tuesday, July 1, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Liberal vs. liberal

In the blue corner: Glenn Greenwald of Salon. In the red corner: Keith Olbermann of MSNBC and DailyKos. The issue: Sen. Barack Obama's reversal of his opposition to a bill to update the 30-year-old Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which largely grants the administration what it wants on the hot-button issue of immunity for telecommunications firms.

At his Salon blog Unclaimed Territory, Mr. Greenwald noted Mr. Olbermann's having called the provision a "literally textbook example of Fascism" being pushed by "the bureaucrats of the Third Reich." Then he crammed down Mr. Olbermann's throat an MSNBC transcript in which the host praised the Obama vote as "not cowering to the left, not going along with ... the new conventional thinking on the FISA bill."

"What's much more notable is Olbermann's full-scale reversal on how he talks about these measures now that Obama - rather than George Bush - supports them," Mr. Greenwald notes. "Grave warning on Olbermann's show that telecom amnesty and FISA revisions were hallmarks of Bush Fascism instantaneously transformed into a celebration that Obama, by supporting the same things, was leading a courageous, centrist crusade in defense of our Constitution."

In a pungent response in his DailyKos diary, Mr. Olbermann said he had changed his mind about the poisonous nature of the FISA bill after talking to John Dean, whom he said had told him that it would only grant the companies civil immunity, but they still could be criminally prosecuted.

Mr. Olbermann said he hoped Mr. Obama's strategy was to "shut up and take the criticism and hope the Republicans don't see the loophole," though a cynic might question the wisdom of saying this publicly at one of the most widely read sites on the Internet. He then went on to the kidney punches ("I don't know much about Mr. Greenwald and I didn't read his full piece") and the rabbit punches (his "suggestion of some kind of betrayal on my part is simplistic and childish.")

Mr. Greenwald fired back the next day, criticizing both Mr. Olbermann's rationalization (noting the skepticism of both Mr. Dean and "Kos" himself Markos Moulitsas) and also the mentality he said it reflected (throwing the lowest liberal blow: a comparison to President Bush).

"There are likely many reasons for [the bill to confine] immunity to civil liability - including the heightened difficulty of proving criminal intent and, most importantly, the fact that Bush, on his way out, can pardon telecoms from criminal but not civil liability. So it's far from certain that Obama - even if he did have a Secret Plan criminally to prosecute telecoms once in office - would even be able to do so," he noted.

"To give Obama a pass on his support for such a heinous bill ... based on this imagined secret plan for the Good that Obama is harboring is to illustrate exactly the sort of blind faith in political leaders that is so dangerous. That's been the Right's mentality to excuse every last thing Bush does."

L'Electrique slide

Continue reading 12Next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Inside the Ring
  2. Senate delays climate bill until September
  3. Health, climate reforms hit roadblocks
  4. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  5. Iranians resume protesting election result
  6. GOP hits Obama using his own words
  7. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  6. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.