Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Warner tried to spread the wealth

Mr. Warner arrives at the inauguration of Tim Kaine as governor of Virginia during a ceremony outside the reconstructed House of Burgesses at Colonial Williamsburg in 2006.  Mr. Warner said his funds failed because of poor management and poor timing.
J.M. Eddins Jr./The Washington Times
Mr. Warner arrives at the inauguration of Tim Kaine as governor of Virginia during a ceremony outside the reconstructed House of Burgesses at Colonial Williamsburg in 2006. Mr. Warner said his funds failed because of poor management and poor timing. J.M. Eddins Jr./The Washington Times

Four of the five venture capital funds set up by former Gov. Mark Warner a decade ago as a way to infuse central, southern and western Virginia with much-needed cash for technology start-up companies have since folded or are in the process of shutting down, failing to spur the economic growth he once championed.

Mr. Warner, a Democrat now considered the front-runner in the U.S. Senate race in Virginia to replace retiring Republican Sen. John W. Warner, no relation, created the funds as a private citizen before his 2001 election as governor. He used his own money - between $1 million and $5 million, he says - coupled with investments from university foundations, corporations and individuals from five diverse regions of the commonwealth.

The five venture capital investments were created after Mr. Warner’s unsuccessful 1996 Senate campaign, but four of them failed to make much of a return for their investors and closed or are in the process of closing, according to interviews with investors and some fund managers.

A fifth, Envest Ventures, has raised more than $160 million in three rounds of fundraising but makes only half of its investments in Virginia.

Designed to infuse young technology firms with much-needed cash, venture capital investments generally are made by groups of third-parties in exchange for a share in the invested companies. The ventures often are risky because the companies could flop.

The investments “for the most part, did not turn out to be financial successes,” said Irving Groves Jr., who co-manages the fund for southern Virginia. “This fund at least found it very difficult to locate investments that the investment committee felt would be beneficial for the communities and the investors.”

Mr. Warner and other investors said the funds floundered because of poor management and poor timing - they were created just before the stock market crashed in 2000, prompting scores of technology companies to fold.

“The idea was the right idea. I’d do it again,” Mr. Warner told The Washington Times during an interview last month. “The timing was bad and in certain cases, the execution was bad.”

The five funds - Southwest One, Monument Capital Partners, Southside Rising, Envest Ventures and Shenandoah Capital Ventures - targeted different geographic areas around Virginia. Four of the funds - Envest, which focused on the Hampton Roads area, is the exception - have closed or are in the process of closing without returning much of their investments.

For instance, Monument Capital, which started closing down last year, targeted the Richmond area. It raised about $20 million from investors but returned approximately $1 million.

“I don’t think the fund could have done a whole lot worse,” said Ivor Massey Jr., whose family investment group, Triad LC, had invested in Monument Capital.

In the case of Monument Capital, Mr. Warner said, money was invested too quickly and “there were a lot of companies that looked like they were home runs for a while before the whole [technology industry] blew up.”

Political gain?

Some Warner critics have said the funds were established to help him in his 2001 run for governor by deepening his ties to southern and rural areas of Virginia, where Democrats previously had not performed well in statewide elections.

One of Mr. Warner’s key campaign messages in the senatorial race was “bringing Virginia together, new economy, new opportunities,” and he often focused in speeches on the need to bring Virginia up to speed in technology and education. During the campaign, he touted his experience as an entrepreneur and in the high-tech industry as necessary to carry Virginia into the new digital age.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • A bomb specialist examines debris Tuesday in Bangkok where two explosions rocked a neighborhood. An Iranian man injured by a grenade he was carrying also was linked to a blast that ripped part of a roof off a house. (Associated Press)

    U.S. concerned about spike in Iran-Israel ‘shadow war’

    By Guy Taylor - The Washington Times

  • Mabus

    Naming of Navy ships returns to tradition

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Alley-Oops

          Immerse yourselves in the genius insights of a high school sports freak and statistical wizard who knows it all. Or at least thinks he does.

          Medicine and Politics in America

          Health care reform, organized medicine, physician practice management, and patient care--a real time look at the challenges facing doctors and patients in America today.