D.C. on verge of new gun law

The District, rebuffed by the Supreme Court last month in a landmark decision on its 32-year-old gun ban, could soon be headed back to court over a new gun law that could take effect as early as Wednesday.

The D.C. Council will vote Tuesday on emergency legislation that will require handgun owners to keep their weapons disassembled or under lock and key in what gun rights advocates see as direct defiance of the Supreme Court ruling.

That ruling said the District could not bar residents from “rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.”

Some interpreted that language at the time as prohibiting any requirement for gun locks.

TWT Editorial:Gun law shenanigans

“They’re doing everything that they can to not comply with the Supreme Court ruling,” said National Rifle Association, who dismissed the proposed legislation as “a joke.”

“Unless the criminal calls you beforehand and lets you know he’s coming over … you’re going to be left defenseless,” Mr. Cox said.

D.C. interim Attorney General Peter J. Nickles acknowledged that officials expected strong reactions to the emergency legislation, which will be in effect for only 90 days.

“We expect a lot of public input, [and] we probably expect also a lawsuit,” he said. “We will learn from what it is we see, and it may be appropriate to change some of the measures.”

In the majority Supreme Court opinion that struck down the District’s gun ban, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that “the District´s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.”

D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty on Monday announced the proposed emergency legislation, which allows guns to be registered for self-defense in the home, requires that a ballistic record be kept on a registered gun, clarifies safe-storage requirements and makes clear that a “carry” license is not required to have guns in the home.

City officials said the legislation will “clarify that firearms in the home must be stored unloaded and either disassembled (or) secured with a trigger lock, gun safe or similar device,” with an exception made for a firearm used against a “reasonably-perceived threat” of immediate harm to a person within a registered gun owner’s home.

Mike Stollenwerk, co-founder of OpenCarry.org, said the bill “doesn’t comply with the [court’s] decision.”

“They’re only meeting this thing halfway,” he said.

Georgetown University’s law school, said the new storage requirements appear to be reasonable restrictions permitted under the court’s decision.

Story Continues →