Home > Blogs

Gilmore, Warner clash over tax plans, energy

Accuse each other of distortion, 'name-calling'

By Gary Emerling THE WASHINGTON TIMES | Sunday, July 20, 2008

Article
Comments ()

HOT SPRINGS, Va. | Republican James S. Gilmore III used the first debate of the Virginia U.S. Senate campaign Saturday to attack opponent Mark Warner as an untrustworthy tax raiser, while the Democrat fired back that Mr. Gilmore is fiscally irresponsible and a partisan name-caller.

The debate - held at the Homestead Resort in Hot Springs, Va. - featured the two former state governors clashing over their actions in office, with each accusing the other of distorting the record and bickering over their respective stances on energy and offshore oil drilling.

"We'll probably hear more name-calling," Mr. Warner, 53, said early in the hourlong debate. "You know, at the end of the day, name-calling doesn't solve the problem."

Mr. Gilmore, whose gubernatorial term ran from 1998 to 2002, trails Mr. Warner by a wide margin in both fundraising and popular support in the race to replace retiring Republican Sen. John W. Warner. He attempted to paint his successor as a governor who unnecessarily pushed through a record $1.4 billion tax increase and a candidate who has waffled in his position on offshore drilling.

Mr. Gilmore cited publicly available letters from 2004 from Virginia Secretary of Finance John M. Bennett showing that state revenues were on the increase prior to passage of Mr. Warner's landmark tax package - an initiative that contradicted Mr. Warner's campaign pledge.

He also accused Mr. Warner of changing his stance on drilling to help reduce gas prices, saying the Democrat has only recently included offshore oil exploration in his energy plan.

Mr. Warner clarified Saturday that he supports lifting a federal moratorium on drilling, but leaving it up to the states to decide whether to allow it.

"The issue truly is trust, and who will do what they say they're going to do," Mr. Gilmore said.

Mr. Warner, meanwhile, said his tax package stemmed largely from the need to remedy a $6 billion shortfall that he said Mr. Gilmore's fiscal policies helped create. He championed his promotion of alternative power sources and derided Mr. Gilmore's insistence on drilling for oil immediately as a "silver-bullet sound bite."

"His approach [of] drill-only has been called a gimmick," Mr. Warner said. "On this question of drilling, nobody says that drilling alone is going to solve [the problem], except for Jim Gilmore."