The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Editor Favorites

GAO hits Air Force deal

Boeing gains track to rebid

By Sean Lengell (Contact) | Thursday, June 19, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Congress' investigative arm Wednesday sharply rebuked the Air Force's awarding of a $35 billion aircraft contract to a European-American team over U.S.-based Boeing Co., and recommended the deal be re-evaluated and the bidding process reopened.

News of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report was greeted enthusiastically by Boeing supporters on Capitol Hill, particularly those from Washington state and Kansas, where Boeing had proposed to build its plane.

"The GAO criticisms were a scathing indictment of the Air Force's process," said Sen. Maria Cantwell, Washington Democrat. "The Air Force will have no choice but to rebid this project."

The GAO assessment, requested by Boeing, will not bind the Air Force to cancel its offer for 179 midair refueling tankers it awarded in February to U.S.-based Northrop Grumman and the European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co. (EADS), the parent company of the passenger-jet maker Airbus.

But to Boeing and its backers, the recommendations will serve as significant ammunition to push for a new deal.

"We welcome and support today's ruling by the GAO fully sustaining the grounds of our protest," said Mark McGraw, Boeing's vice president of tanker programs. "We look forward to working with the Air Force on next steps in this critical procurement for our war fighters."

The GAO said its "review of the record led us to conclude that the Air Force had made a number of significant errors that could have affected the outcome of what was a close competition between Boeing and Northrop Grumman."

The GAO suggested that the Air Force "reopen discussions with the offerors, obtain revised proposals, re-evaluate the revised proposals, and make a new source selection decision."

The Air Force said Wednesday that it wouldn't specifically address the GAO report until it completed a review of the recommendations.

"The Air Force will do everything we can to rapidly move forward so America receives this urgently needed capability," said Sue C. Payton, assistant secretary of the Air Force's acquisition division. "The Air Force will select the best value tanker for our nation's defense, while being good stewards of the taxpayer dollar."

Continue reading 12Next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  3. Inside the Ring
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. YON: Girl with no future
  5. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. Israeli know-how
  8. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Will you be traveling this 4th of July weekend?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.