The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Local

Proposed state rule worries parents of special-ed youths

By Zinie Chen Sampson ASSOCIATED PRESS | Sunday, June 22, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Matthew Jenkins was diagnosed with autism when he was 2 1/2 years old, but his parents say he's made good progress in school with the help of an educational specialist who works with his teacher.

But now Matthew's parents worry that if new state regulations take effect, the 7-year-old's school can remove the specialist without their consent, a fear state education officials are trying to downplay.

"What we've got going now is working," said Eric Jenkins, Matthew's father. "If it's not broken, don't try and fix it."

About 170,000 Virginia students receive public special-education services, at an average annual cost of $11,000 per person, compared to $9,900 for students without disabilities.

Drawing the most attention is a proposal to allow school officials to end special-education services for a child without parents' approval, which is required under current policy.

The measure is among several in the Virginia Department of Education's 315-page draft regulations, which are open for public comment until June 30.

Nearly 400 people have testified at public hearings statewide, and officials have received more than 9,000 comments, with most opposed to the changes, said Assistant Superintendent for Special Education and Student Services H. Douglas Cox.

Congress' reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2004 and subsequent changes to federal regulations require states to revamp their special-education laws to conform. IDEA requires each student to be given an individualized education plan tailored to specific needs.

U.S. Department of Education's Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, said at least half the states are still revising their special-educational laws.

Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine, a Democrat, has said he opposes changes that reduce parental involvement.

The Virginia State Board of Education is expected to vote on the regulations in the fall.

Virginia is one of the few states that require parental consent, which goes beyond what the federal regulations demand, said U.S. Department of Education's department that monitors state special-education plans.

"Many states have taken a lean approach in their requirements," though each state can decide whether to offer additional protections, she said.

Mr. Cox said parents are already part of the team that determines whether to terminate services to children, and parents can appeal any decision at the school division's expense.

However, the proposed regulations also would shift supervision of hearing officers from the state Supreme Court to the Department of Education, which advocates for children with disabilities say could create conflicts of interest.

Other proposed changes include loosening progress-report requirements, redefining the age range for children to be classified with developmental delays and removing short-term academic benchmarks.

Special-education administrators and state officials say the changes would reduce paperwork and save money for school divisions.

"No resources are infinite; we don't want them to be directed to where they're not needed," said education spokesman Charles Pyle.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  4. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  5. YON: Girl with no future
  6. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  7. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  8. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  9. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  10. Israeli know-how

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

McDonnell proposes job-creation plan for Virginia

Charting the market: Area selling environment gets better

Deeds vs. McDonnell: Tweets don't fail now

Weekend Fishing Report

CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Fond farewell to Fort Monroe

Metro Briefs

Kaine rebuffs second request for travel records

Charles Barbour, 89, dies

OPERA: Pitch-perfect 'Beggar's'

States struggle to comply with sex offender database

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.