The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Pro-life Democrats support bill

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Genuine economic stimulus

  • Politics

    Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

  • Politics

    CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

  • Politics

    Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

  • Commentary

    TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

Home » News » Local

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Death-row inmate's defense cites jury nonfeasance

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Local Stories

  • Saturday's National Marathon to close streets
  • Maryland delays P.G. County card game referendum
  • Elvis shakes up press again at Newseum
  • 2 fired in wake of Md. juvenile center death

By

ANNAPOLIS (AP) — Attorneys for a Maryland death-row inmate argued yesterday that their client's sentence should be overturned because a jury didn't use the highest standard of proof when weighing aggravating factors of his crime with mitigating circumstances.

But an assistant attorney general contended that courts have consistently approved Maryland's method of considering the factors in a death-penalty case.

Robert Biddle, who is representing Jody Lee Miles in a case before the state Court of Appeals, contends the process for weighing the circumstances of the crime is unconstitutional in Maryland because it doesn't use the court's highest threshold of certainty.

In a capital case, a jury is asked to recommend whether a person should receive a death sentence after the jury has convicted the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

When the jury decides whether to recommend the death sentence, it is instructed to weigh the crime's aggravating factors that warrant a potential death sentence with mitigating circumstances, such as a person's upbringing. Juries are told to make that decision based on a preponderance of the evidence, rather than the higher threshold of beyond a reasonable doubt.

"We contend that the constitution requires that Maryland tell jurors you can't make that finding unless you find it beyond a reasonable doubt," Mr. Biddle said.

Mr. Biddle based his argument largely on a U.S. Supreme Court case last year, Cunningham v. California. The court ruled that a defendant can't be subject to a greater potential sentence merely by a preponderance of the evidence, instead of beyond a reasonable doubt.

James Williams, a Maryland assistant attorney general, argued that courts have continually approved using preponderance of evidence in weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors. He said capital cases were incompatible with the Cunningham case, which did not involve capital punishment.

Miles is on death row for the 1997 robbery and murder of theater manager Edward Atkinson of Salisbury. He is one of five men on death row in Maryland.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare
  3. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  4. HANSON: Proud to help -- and to fly our flag
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
More Top Stories »
  1. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  2. BERMAN: Charities behaving badly
  3. STEYN: 'Deemocracy' in action
  4. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  5. PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  5. Obama urges Dems to come together for health care
More Top Stories »
  1. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
  2. CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care
  3. Raucous buildup precedes health care vote
  4. HANSON: Proud to help -- and to fly our flag
  5. EDITORIAL: GOP senators must give up pork

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

Health care reform has been compared to the creation of Social Security and Medicare. Do you agree the impact will be as fundemental and as encompassing?

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Stupak sells out pro-life movement

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.